Does Obama Response to Death Star Petition Signify End of Seriousness in Political Discourse?

acecand all along we thought dick Does Obama Response to Death Star Petition Signify End of Seriousness in Political Discourse?

Over at the White House’s
petitions website – where citizens can post demands and the Obama
administration has pledged to answer them if 25,000
people sign on within 30 days – President Obama’s
crack team of smartypants has responded to a suggestion that the
government build a Star Wars-style Death Star as a jobs program and
defense plan:
The Administration shares your desire for job creation and a
strong national defense, but a Death Star isn’t on the horizon.
Here are a few reasons:
The construction of the Death Star has been
estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000.
We’re working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.
The Administration does not support blowing up planets.
Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death
Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man

Ha ha ha!This White House crew is so hip and funny, isn’t
it? Star Wars references! I mean, I bet Mitt Romney
doesn’t even know how many moons Tatooine has! Watching the Obama
admin connect with the kids these days is like listening to This
American Life on an iPad while riding a fixed-gear bike wearing a
retro hat (not from the lounge-era retro fad, but from the newer,
even more double-plus-good-ironic era of 20 minutes ago).I mean, remember the Obama team’s great Easter
Egg Roll video that showed the administration’s mastery of the
new media? (I’m talking about the 2009 Easter Egg Roll, not the
2010 one during which Michelle Obama replaced candy with hand
sanitizer and “pre-screened
administration may not support blowing up whole planets, but it is
clearly 100 percent in favor of blowing up portions of our own big
blue marble, whether it has gotten the requisite authorization from
Congress or any court in the country. Actual, publicly discussed
and debated and settled legal frameworks for
dropping semi-accurate bombs on people (actual assumed bad guys
on the initial strike, then emergency responders on the second) are
for lesser people.And the administration is working hard to reduce the deficit? So
that explains why the $22.5 billion in new revenue from hiking
taxes on the richest Americans is offset
by $65 billion in foregone revenue for special-interest
business tax credits? Am I misremembering or didn’t Obama actually
promise to cut
$2.50 in spending for every $1 dollar he jacked taxes? Yeah, it
must be me.It’s kinda funny that the answer to the Death Star petition
ironically references a famous Jedi mind-trick (“this
isn’t the petition response you’re looking for”) because the
entire petition site is a classic gesture from the repressive
tolerance handbook. I mean, it gives all of us a voice and a way to
work within the system!You can’t get up against the wall
motherfucker when the wall is actually a series of unlocked doors
and open windows, no what I mean, Chewbacca? And we know that the
Obama administration is the most openest admin ever (well,
except for an endless closetful of shrouds that puts Turin to
shame) because it keeps telling us it is.Remind us again: Who is
the adult in the room again? Because it isn’t obvious.And to answer the question in the title of this blog post: No,
the Obama admin’s response to the Death Star petition doesn’t
signify the end of serious political discourse. That would imply
the most transparentest, coolest regime ever never had made
executive power claims that would make George W. Bush think twice,
or hadn’t deported record numbers of immigrants, or wasn’t
prosecuting the drug war its fans don’t seem to mind anymore.

Link to article – 

Does Obama Response to Death Star Petition Signify End of Seriousness in Political Discourse?

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply


Recent Posts


%d bloggers like this: