Proposition 8 oral arguments: The very best LOL moments

47c0mf Proposition 8 oral arguments: The very best LOL moments

The Supreme Court ruling on Proposition 8 is serious business, but that doesn’t mean the justices can’t get cheeky while deciding the fate of California’s same-sex couples.There were several laugh breaks during Tuesday morning’s oral arguments, which lasted just over an hour.Let us yuk along with them:Justice Elena Kagan gives Charles Cooper, the lawyer arguing in favor of Proposition 8, some real talk about having babies over age 55 JUSTICE KAGAN: Well, suppose a State said, Mr. Cooper, suppose a State said that, Because we think that the focus of marriage really should be on procreation, we are not going to give marriage licenses anymore to any couple where both people are over the age of 55. Would that be constitutional? MR. COOPER: No, Your Honor, it would not be constitutional. JUSTICE KAGAN: Because that’s the same State interest, I would think, you know. If you are over the age of 55, you don’t help us serve the Government’s interest in regulating procreation through marriage. So why is that different? MR. COOPER: Your honor, even with respect to couples over the age off 55, it’s very rare that both couples — both parties to the couple are infertile and  the traditional -­ (Laughter.) JUSTICE KAGAN: No, really, because if the couple — I can just assure you, if both the woman and the man are over the age of, there are not a lot of children coming out of that marriage. (Laughter.) Meanwhile, Justice Antonin Scalia ponders the efficacy of fertility pop quizzes JUSTICE SCALIA: I suppose we could have a questionnaire at the marriage desk when people come in to get the marriage — you know, Are you fertile or are you not fertile? (Laughter.) Continue Reading…


Proposition 8 oral arguments: The very best LOL moments

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply


Recent Posts


%d bloggers like this: