Nasal tubes are jammed up the prisoners’ noses until a liquid supplement reaches their stomachs. The tubes, which are 61cm in length or even longer, stay in the prisoners’ nostrils until a chest X-ray or a test dose of water show that the nutritional supplement has reached the prisoner’s stomach. The shocking procedure doesn’t stop there. Detainees are then sent to a “dry cell” with no running water while they undergo supervision to make sure they don’t vomit. If they regurgitate their supplement, they’re sent right back to the restraint chair.Details of the “chair restraint system clinical protocol” were published in a newly revised Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Guantanamo hunger strikers. The document was obtained by Al Jazeera, from the United States Southern Command (SOUTHCOM), which has oversight over the joint task force that operates the highly controversial prison.The new policy went into effect March 5, just one month after Guantanamo detainees launched the hunger strike in response to alleged mistreatment and mishandling of their Korans.”Just as battlefield tactics must change throughout the course of a conflict, the medical responses to GTMO detainees who hunger strike has evolved with time,” the revised SOP says. Two weeks ago, 40 more nurses were sent to Guantanamo Bay to assist with force-feedings.Force-feeding is an extremely invasive and highly controversial practice which many human rights activists – and the UN – say is torturous. But what’s perhaps even more shocking than the procedure itself is that the final decision regarding who will be force-fed is left up to Guantanamo Commander John Smith – not physicians.“In the event a detainee refrains from eating or drinking to the point where it is determined by the medical assessment that continued fasting will result in a threat to life or seriously jeopardize health, and involuntary feeding is required, no direct action will be taken without the knowledge and written approval of Commander [Navy Rear Adm. John Smith, Jr.],” the document says.While doctors are, in fact, present at the site, they exist solely to carry out the military’s commands.According to Leonard Rubenstein, a lawyer at the Center of Public Health and Human Rights at Johns Hopkins University and the Berman Institute of Bioethics, the document is alarming because it makes clear that doctors and nurses are simply “adjuncts of the security apparatus.””The clinical judgment of a doctor or a nurse is basically trumped by this policy and protocol. Doctors are not acting with the kind of professional medical independence,” he said.Giving Cmdr. Smith such extreme power to decide who gets force-fed “violates core ethical values of the medical profession,” American Medical Association president Dr. Jeremy Lazarus wrote in a letter to Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel last month.“Every competent patient has the right to refuse medical intervention, including life-sustaining interventions,” he wrote. “The AMA has long endorsed the World Medical Association Declaration of Tokyo, which is unequivocal on the point: ‘Where a prisoner refuses nourishment and is considered by the physician as capable of forming an unimpaired and rational judgment concerning the consequences of such a voluntary refusal of nourishment, he or she shall not be fed artificially.’”But authorities seem to place less value on the rules and ethics of the World Medical Association Declaration than Lazarus does. According to the SOP, medical professionals will make “reasonable efforts” to gain consent from prisoners, but will perform the procedure without being granted such permission.According to one detainee, Kuwaiti-born Fayiz al-Kandari, the nasal tubes used in the procedure are large, painful and come with hazardous side effects. ”It takes several attempts to get the tube into the right place,” his lawyer, Carlos Warner, said. “Once it goes down his throat he has a difficult time breathing. There’s a gag reflex.”But the SOP says otherwise, claiming that the force-feeding can ”be completed comfortably over 20 to 30 minutes.”Guantanamo spokesman Lt. Col. Samuel House said that medical professionals who conduct the force feedings “carefully evaluate each patient to determine the appropriate size of tube to use.” He added that the sizes of the tubes used “should not be a big problem in an adult.”Those on the receiving end of the force-feeding disagree. However, they have no option but to sit shackled to the restraint chair and let the procedure take place against their will – because the anti-spitting and biting masks are in place to prevent them from interrupting the process.If the inmates do succeed in biting the feeding tubes, they face even more force and discomfort.“If the detainee is able to get the [enteral feeding] tube between his teeth, the RN [registered nurse] shall…direct the guard staff to stabilize the detainee’s head in the midline position…hold traction on the tube for as long as necessary for the detainee to relax his jaw; then continue safe removal of the tube. This may take considerable time,” the document says.While the detainees show no signs of ending their hunger strike, US authorities at the prison remain determined to follow the practices outlined in the SOP – despite any criticism from human rights activists or the UN.And it seems US President Barack Obama doesn’t have a problem with the force-feeding techniques.Less than two weeks ago, the President said he believes the “Pentagon is trying to manage the situation as best as they can,” adding that he doesn’t want “these individuals to die.”Obama vowed to close down Guantanamo at the beginning of his first term in office in 2009. However, he was blocked from fulfilling that promise by legislation passed by the US Congress.Less than two weeks ago, Obama vowed to “re-engage with Congress to try to make the case [Guantanamo] is not something that’s in the best interests of the American people.” There are currently 100 inmates participating in the hunger strike at Guantanamo Bay, 29 of whom are receiving enteral feeds. Five of those prisoners are being observed in the detainee hospital, Lt. Col. Samuel House said in a Monday statement. The official numbers differ from those of human rights activists, who have put the number of strikers up to 130. … Read More
Robo-Stop: Mankind raging against ‘rise of machines’
http://www.youtube.com/v/L78Y4bMDyT0?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata More: Robo-Stop: Mankind raging against ‘rise of machines’
Republican trio push to militarize U.S. response to domestic terrorism
Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham (SC), John McCain (AZ), and Kelly Ayotte (NH) lashed out at liberals and libertarians on Tuesday, claiming it was dangerous to oppose the notion the United States was a “battlefield.” The three senators have been pushing for Boston Marathon bombing…
Peter King: Treat bomber as enemy combatant because ‘battlefield now in the U.S.’
Rep. Peter King (R-NY) says that Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzokhar Tsarnaev should be treated as an enemy combatant and does not deserve to be informed of his Miranda rights to remain silent because the “battlefield is now in the United States.” In an interview on Sunday, Fox News…
US decisive to stay guard of Gitmo prisoners’ rights – Nuland
During a daily press briefing, Nuland got into a heated exchange with Associated Press reporter Matthew Lee.Nuland reported that a Russian citizen incarcerated in Guantanamo for over a decade without trial has refused to meet a Russian delegation because he has that right. She also assured the US is going to observe that right for him in the future:Matthew Lee: So it’s okay to pluck someone off the battlefield and incarcerate them at Guantanamo with no trial, but they – you are certainly going to respect his right not to see the Russian delegation?Victoria Nuland: Well, I’m not going to comment on the first part of that, but…ML: Well…VN: …we do – we have been working…ML: It’s interesting which rights you’re going to defend.VN: We have been working hard, as you know, to meet international humanitarian law standards at Guantanamo, including the right to refuse visits by individuals incarcerated.After Nuland wound up, she immediately addressed ‘please’ to a next questioner.Russian citizen Ravil Mingazov, who was arrested in Pakistan on suspicion of collaborating with Al-Qaeda, has been kept at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility since October 2002.“We do know that the government of Russia has requested access to Mr. Mingazov, who is detained at Guantanamo. We have confirmed back to the government of Russia that Mr. Mingazov has refused through his own legal counsel to meet with any Russian delegation. We have conveyed this back to the Russians,” Nuland explained.“So we’re not able to facilitate the interview that they requested because we have a long-lasting policy of not forcing such interviews if they are not voluntary,” she said, specifying that an invitation to a Russian delegation visit to Guantanamo to get a “broader understanding” of the US detention operations in the prison “remains open.”The Guantanamo detention facility has once again returned into the glare of world media after a number of prisoners went on hunger strike around February 6 this year. The action has lasted for nearly two months now.Our readers can learn more about the Gitmo hunger strike from RT’s ‘Gitmo hunger strike: Timeline’. … Read More
Up to 600 European jihadist fighters among Syrian rebels – study
An estimate of the International Centre of for the Study of Radicalization (ICRS), based on more than 450 open sources, has found that up to 5,500 foreign fighters have traveled to Syria since the beginning of the uprising against the ruling regime. Of them, up to 11 per cent originate from Europe.”Between 140 and 600 Europeans have gone to Syria since early 2011,” researcher Aaron Y. Zelin says.Britain accounts for the biggest number of arrivals, with up to 134 people joining the cause. The Netherlands comes second with up to 107 people, next are France (up to 92), Belgium (up to 85) and Denmark (up to 78).”As with previous conflicts, the picture is far from complete and will probably remain so for years to come,” said Zelin on the numbers presented in the study.”There is no ‘true census’ of foreign fighters, and publicly available sources are inevitably incomplete.”The research suggests most foreigners have not yet returned to their home countries.”Based on the conflict totals, we estimate that 70 to 441 Europeans are still currently present in Syria,” ICSR report states. “This suggests that most of the Europeans who have travelled to Syria are still on the battlefield.”Some of the data for the research was pulled from the so-called online martyrdom notices of jihadists, ideologically affiliated with Al-Qaeda. Out of 249 such martyrdom notices, about 3 per cent identify countries of origin as European. People travelled “to die in Syria” from Albania, Britain, Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Kosovo, Spain and Sweden.The researchers say, neither political motivations, nor jihadist ideology are among the primary reasons for the people to go to Syria, but the atrocities of war.”The most commonly cited reasons for joining rebel forces are the horrific images of the conflict, stories about atrocities committed by government forces, and the perceived lack of support from Western and Arab countries,” ICSR reports explains.”In many cases, these individuals fully adopt the jihadist doctrine and ideology only when they are on the ground and in contact with hardened fighters.” This ‘ideological’ borrowing cannot but worry the European governments. For instance, the Netherlands raised the threat of a terror attack to “substantial” last month, saying the increased risk stemmed mainly from jihadists returning from fighting in Syria. British security services are also concerned the returnees may use their military know-how to wreak havoc back home.The researchers, however, do not believe there is an immediate connection between fighting in Syria and terrorism in Europe.”Not everyone who has joined the Syrian rebels is Al-Qaeda, and only a small number may ever become involved in terrorism after returning to Europe,” Zelin said. “That said, it would be wrong to conclude that individuals who have trained and fought in Syria pose no potential threat,” he remarked. He pointed at the recently-published research by the Norwegian academic Thomas Hegghammer, which reveals that terrorists with foreign experience are far more lethal, dangerous and sophisticated than purely domestic cells. … Read More
Kurt Loder Reviews The Place Beyond the Pines and The Host
The Place Beyond the Pines is a movie in
three parts, writes Kurt Loder, tracking the lives of Ryan
Gosling’s doomed loser and Bradley Cooper’s conflicted cop and
contemplating the interlocked fates they pass on to their children.
Fortunately — this being a film that runs two hours and 20 minutes
– there are also propulsive jolts of police corruption, botched
robberies, and hair-raising chases. The Host, on the other
hand, is entirely disappointing. It’s not often that even the
clunkiest sci-fi movie will put you in mind of Battlefield
Earth. The Host, however, manages that dubious
honor. View this article.
… Read More






