Tag Archives: Conservative

Image mf.gif

Economic case for UK to stay in Europe is ‘overwhelming’

||

Related

UK-EU relations still divisive in Britain 23/01/2013 17:15 CET
Cameron’s major EU speech postponed again 17/01/2013 23:15 CET
UK lawmakers want tax crackdown on multinationals 03/12/2012 14:45 CET
The UK and the EU: in or out of the Union? 23/11/2012 11:04 CET
Britain faces further cutbacks 10/10/2012 17:23 CET

First it was rebel members of parliament, now business leaders have waded into the debate over Britain’s membership of the European Union.

Top industry figures have signed a letter in the British Independent newspaper, saying the economic case to stay in Europe is “overwhelming.”

Virgin founder Richard Branson is among them.The leaders say the UK stands to lose up to 108 billion euros a year if it goes it alone.

It comes as British Prime Minister David Cameron is accused of “losing control” of his Conservative party, amid internal divisions over Europe. He has recently been forced to back a new bill that would enshrine an in-out referendum pledge in law.

Cameron’s problems have been made worse by claims that an unidentified, close aide described Conservative grassroots Eurosceptics as “mad swivel-eyed loons.” The comments have been denied by Downing Street.

More about: , , , , ,

Copyright © 2013 euronews

||

JavaScript is required in order to view this article’s accompanying video

Read More

Image gagging-uk-police-payout.jpg

Endemic gagging: Over 300 UK police silenced with taxpayer millions – report

The gagging clauses are being widely used across UK police forces, leading to concerns they are being used to ensure the silence of police employees. This would prevent them from speaking out over issues of public interest, according to a Freedom of Information survey, reported in the Telegraph. Stephen Barclay, a Conservative member of the Public Accounts Committee, told the paper that the practice was “very concerning,” going on to state that “these agreements have a clear effect beyond those who sign them because other officers with ambition will see what has happened to those who have concerns and decide to stay silent.” The 13 forces which responded to the requests for information were only the ones which agreed to provide details, meaning the actual number enforcing the confidentiality agreements is likely to be significantly higher. The Freedom of Information requests showed that some 200 officials and civil servants put their name to compromise agreements over the course of two years, costing some 14 million pounds. Additionally, 4,500 local authority workers entered similar arrangements. Compromise agreements are a legally-binding deal, usually surrounding the termination of employment, during which soon-to-be former employees are provided with a hefty sum, providing they do not pursue any claims against their employer, thereby preventing possible complaints. Such compromise agreements frequently involve ‘confidentiality clauses’, meaning the terms of the agreement cannot be revealed, and sometimes, alongside some or all aspects of the employment. Signatories have in the past been specifically instructed not to air any previously-aired concerns with the press. Lancashire Constabulary had the highest incidence, reporting 34 signings. Surrey Police’s 28 agreements over the course of three years have cost the taxpayer some 614,000 pounds.Greater Manchester Police confirmed to the paper that 14 agreements had been signed in the past three years, with a further 17 being signed by Nothumbria Police.London’s Metropolitan Police is also implicated, having gagged 230 of its police officers over a seven year  period, with its former head of human resources, Martin Tiplady, being handed 259,462 pounds after he put his name to one of the agreements. The former commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson received 176,838 pounds in a single payment: more than 1.8 times his annual salary.James Patrick, a constable in the Metropolitan Police, was investigated for gross misconduct and told not to use Twitter or his blog last December, after he expressed concerns over the impact of the cuts on the force.“This is someone who has tried to raise his concerns through the legitimate channels, but was not able to do so,” his lawyer Karen Todner told the Guardian at the point of investigation.“They are gagged in the NHS, arrested in our police forces and blacklisted in many industries,” Cathy James, chief executive of the charity Public Concern at Work told the Guardian earlier this week, prompting calls for a review of legislation.In the case of the NHS, potential whistleblowers have been gagged, threatened and stopped from raising concerns pertaining to patient safety.Barclay told the Daily Mail earlier this year that NHS gagging clauses were having “having a chilling effect on whistleblowers,” saying that “hundreds of potential whistleblowers may have been prevented from speaking out for fear of legal action.” The former chief of United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust, Gary Walker, revealed in February that he received a 500,000-pound ‘super gag’ in 2010. The money was offered in exchange for keeping silent regarding his belief that his hospital was a threat to patient safety. Read More

Image surveillance-ap-national-security.jpg

Surveillance of AP on behalf of national security the ‘last refuge of scoundrels’

RT: If indeed in the interest of national security surely the action against the Associated Press was justified in this instance?Norman Solomon: Well, a lot is done in the name of national security and protecting the public. Several decades ago spying by the Nixon administration on the press – dirty tricks and so forth – were also rationalized within the White House and later publicly as somehow protecting the public from subversive or other elements that threaten the republic. And that is, really, one of the last refuges of scoundrels, when it comes to top leaders who want to turn off the tap of information reaching their own public. That those leaders would rather the public be kept in the dark. And I think what we’ve seen with these revelations about the phone records of AP reporters is that this administration, which has already waged a larger war against more whistleblowers than any other in US history, has continued to push the envelope and tried to have a chilling event not only on journalists but to sources within the administration.RT: And targeting obviously a credible organization like the Associated Press, in some ways has it been a victory for journalists because it’s been a major embarrassment now for the Obama administration?NS: Well, I think it cuts both ways, because while the Obama administration in the last couple of days has encountered fierce criticism from very mainstream and even some conservative media outlets, the administration has also sent a very clear message to every employee of the US government. “You may think that you’re on your cellphone or your home telephone speaking to a journalist telling them something that perhaps we at the White House don’t want you to tell, but now you’re on clearer notice than ever that down the road your phone number may turn up in subpoenaed documents by the Department of Justice or some other agency, and then we can turn the screws on you and find out whether you’re a whistleblower.” That’s a very dangerous message, and in that sense this is a blow for freedom of the press, against freedom of the press.RT: But aren’t there rules though? If it is classified information that person is leaking to the press, then of course the White House would be saying that sort of information could compromise national security, then they’re in the wrong and they do deserve to be tracked down?NS: Well, that’s always the argument, but it turns out that there’s so much classification of information that the US public, not only has a right to know, but must know for democracy to function. And to be kept in the dark, to not know what is being done in our names, with our own tax dollars, by our elected leaders is to short-circuit our own capacity to be part of a democratic process.RT: So a fine balance, then, between the need for national security and for respecting freedom of speech and privacy rights. It’s going to be a long argument this one, isn’t it? And do you think there ever will be a balance found?NS: Well, the balance will be fought over, but until the US ends the perpetual war footing, this so-called War on Terror, then the domestic repression is going to be a major problem. Read More

Image hqdefault.jpg

Obama’s New Amerika

http://www.youtube.com/v/Ounq1qliNZk?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata Source:  Obama’s New Amerika

Image 90x51_224454_scandals-could-clip-obama-s-wings-i.jpg

Washington’s top tax official forced out amid scandal

||

Related

Scandals could clip Obama’s wings in his second term 14/05/2013 18:39 CET
Relief for Obama as the US avoids the “fiscal cliff” 02/01/2013 06:45 CET
Obama hails tax hikes for the rich in fiscal cliff… 02/01/2013 11:15 CET
Americans react to last-minute ‘fiscal cliff’ deal 02/01/2013 18:04 CET
Quick fix or long term solution for the US? 01/01/2013 11:45 CET

US tax agency chief Steve Miller has had to leave his job after it emerged his staff had singled out conservative groups for extra scrutiny.

President Barack Obama announced his departure on Wednesday.

Obama said the Treasury Secretary had asked for and accepted the resignation of Miller, who was acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

“I have reviewed the Treasury Department watchdog’s report and the misconduct that it uncovered is inexcusable. It is inexcusable and Americans are right to be angry about it and I am angry about it,” Obama told reporters.

“I will not tolerate this kind of behaviour in any agency but especially in the IRS given the power that it has and the reach that it has in all of our lives.

“Given the controversy surrounding this audit it is important to institute new leadership that can help restore confidence going forward.”

Requests for tax-exempt status by groups associated with the conservative Tea Party movement are said to have been subjected to “overly aggressive” reviews.

The US Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation.

The IRS controversy is one of several points of weakness in the Obama administration that Republicans are seeking to exploit. Senior Republicans such as former Vice-President Dick Cheney and one-time presidential candidate John McCain have slammed what they say was a government ‘cover-up’ of an attack on the US embassy in the Libyan town of Benghazi last September. The allegation is that Obama and his team downplayed the involvement of al-Qaeda cells in the attack in order not to harm Obama’s re-election chances. On Wednesday the White House released 99 pages of e-mails between various agencies including the CIA, the State Department and the FBI that government officials claim prove there was no organised cover-up.

And Obama is also under fire for restricting press freedom after it emerged the US Justice Department secretly seized phone records of Associated Press. It’s widely believed US authorities subpoenaed the records to try to identify who provided information about an alleged terrorist plot in Yemen. The US Attorney’s Office has said it values press freedom but is obliged to balance these with national security and public interest.

More about: , , ,

Copyright © 2013 euronews

||

JavaScript is required in order to view this article’s accompanying video

Read More

Image hqdefault.jpg

Nigel Farage, Peter Bone, Emma Reynolds on Europe (13May13)

http://www.youtube.com/v/QPB0VeMM4MM?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata Link -  Nigel Farage, Peter Bone, Emma Reynolds on Europe (13May13)

Fox News host on Benghazi: ‘We’re getting a little lopsided’ by favoring Republicans

Fox News host Megyn Kelly admitted on Wednesday that the conservative network’s coverage of that day’s Benghazi hearings had been a “little lopsided” after Democratic lawmakers were repeatedly cut off for commercial breaks. Following opening statements, Fox News aired all of…

Read More