An Oklahoma Tea Partier was charged with two felony counts for allegedly sending a threatening email to a state lawmaker, pushing him to support legislation that would block Agenda 21 from being implemented in the state.Al Gerhart, the co-founder of the Sooner Tea Party, was on Tuesday charged with blackmail and violating the Oklahoma Computer Crimes Act, both felonies. Gerhart admitted last week to sending the email to state senator Cliff Branan, though he denies he did anything wrong. The charges came after Branan turned the email over to state officials.From the Oklahoman:Misspelling one word, Gerhart wrote: “Branan, Get that bill heard or I will make sure you regret not doing it. I will make you the laughing stock of the Senate if I don’t hear that this bill will be heard and passed. We will dig into your past, yoru family, your associates and once we start on you there will be no end to it. This is a promise.” Gerhart admitted at a news conference at the Capitol last week that he sent the email. “Political pain and embarrassment will be necessary if the citizens expect to regain control of this Senate down here from the state chamber of commerce and special interests,” he said. “The time for ‘nice’ behavior is over with.”Continue Reading… … Read More
Reuters suspends editor for conspiring with Anonymous
http://www.youtube.com/v/Ig8W0-TJUv0?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata Read more: Reuters suspends editor for conspiring with Anonymous
Japan to broadcast 4K UHDTV in 2014, 8K as early as 2016
If CES was any indication, Ultra-High Definition televisions will soon be all the rage. While increasing pixel counts are always proportionately more awesome, there's a minor snag: 4K UHD content is nearly non-existent. Japan is aiming to wrestle this problem head-on though with a government-led initiative to roll out 4K… … Read More
Scott Walker Ex-Aide Fined, But Avoids Jail Time
MILWAUKEE — A former aide to Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker has been sentenced to a year of probation after she was convicted of doing campaign work on county time.Darlene J. Wink was also ordered Thursday to pay a fine and courts costs of $2,000. She pleaded guilty last year to two misdemeanor counts of political solicitation by a public employee.Read More…
More on Scott Walker
Baylen Linnekin on How Menu-Labeling Laws Harm American Pizza
Baylen Linnekin on How Menu-Labeling Laws Harm American Pizza
Jan. 5, 2013 8:00 am
The Food and Drug Administration
moved closer this week to implementing a proposed menu-labeling
rule requiring certain restaurants and food sellers to list calorie
counts and other information on their menus. As it’s now
constructed, the rule would apply not just to chain restaurants
like McDonald’s and Applebee’s but also to grocery stores and pizza
restaurants—both of which oppose the FDA’s plans. In fact, writes
Baylen Linnekin, complying with the proposed menu-labeling rule
would be somewhere between costly and impossible for tens of
thousands of pizza and grocery chains.View this article.
Baylen J. Linnekin, a lawyer, is executive director of Keep Food Legal, a Washington, D.C. nonprofit that advocates in favor of food freedom—the right to grow, raise, produce, buy, sell, share, cook, eat, and drink the foods of our own choosing.
SHARE
Tumblr
Blogger
StumbleUpon
Digg
Delicious
VIEW HIT & RUN ARCHIVES »
… Read More
Adam Maguire Allegedly Burned Children With Cigarette To Teach Them To Meditate
A 28-year-old man from Maine allegedly burned two children with a lit cigarette in an attempt to teach them how to meditate.Adam Maguire has been charged with two counts of domestic violence assault and two counts of endangering the welfare of a child, according to the Bangor Daily News. Houlton Police Chief Butch Asselin told the paper that Maguire burned the children, whose names and ages are being withheld, in the back and neck, “in an attempt to show them pain compliance while meditating.Read More…
More on Video
Montana Medical Marijuana Grower Faces 80-Year Prison Sentence
On Tuesday I
noted a Washington Post ;editorial that described
the Obama administration’s policy regarding medical marijuana as
mainly “hands off,” with the Justice Department “focusing scarce
resources on major violators.” Similarly, the Associated Press
reported a few weeks ago that “the Obama administration has
largely turned a blind eye” to medical marijuana in states where it
is legal. Here is what that hands-off, blind-eye policy looks like
in Montana: Chris Williams, a partner in Montana Cannabis,
faces a prison sentence of 80 to 92 years for supplying
patients with marijuana—and for insisting on his right to a
trial.
Williams’ business was one of several Montana dispensaries
raided by the Drug Enforcement Administration last year. He is the
only defendant arrested as a result of those raids who has refused
to plead guilty. One of his partners, Tom Daubert,
received probation; another, Chris Lindsey, reached a similar
deal but has not been sentenced yet; and a third, Richard Flor,
died while serving a five-year prison sentence.
What explains this astonishing range of penalties, from zero
prison time to nearly a century? Mandatory minimums. Specifically,
prosecutors charged Williams, after he turned down a series of plea
deals, with four counts of using firearms in furtherance of a drug
crime, based on pistols and shotguns kept at the Helena grow
operation where he worked. Federal law prescribes a
five-year mandatory minimum penalty for the first such offense and
25 years ;for each subsequent offense. Furthermore,
the sentences must be served consecutively. Hence Williams, who was
convicted of all four gun charges, will get ;at
least ;80 years when he is sentenced in January, even
though he was not charged with wielding the guns, let alone hurting
anyone with them. In fact, having the guns around would have been
perfectly legal had he not been growing marijuana. (This is the
same provision under which ;Weldon Angelos, a 24-year-old
record producer, received a ;55-year
sentence ;for a few small-time pot sales in
2004.) ;The Missoulian ;reports
that Williams could get an additional 12 years for the four
marijuana counts on which he was convicted, but whatever the
precise number it is effectively a life sentence.
The mandatory penalty is so absurdly, unfathomably harsh, in
fact, that after Williams’ trial U.S. Attorney Mike Cotter took the
extraordinary step of
offering ;to drop one count of
manufacturing ;marijuana, two counts of possession with intent
to distribute, and the three firearm counts associated with them,
which would have made it possible for Williams to serve “only” 10
years. All Williams had to do was refrain from appealing his
convictions. He refused, insisting that he did nothing wrong and
that the feds had no business interfering with a medical marijuana
system blessed by the state of Montana. ;
During his trial ;Williams was not allowed to mention
Montana’s medical marijuana law, since it is not deemed relevant to
his guilt under the federal Controlled Substances Act, which
recognizes no legitimate use for cannabis. In addition to his
criminal appeal, Williams is pursuing a
civil suit arguing that the federal crackdown on medical
marijuana violates the 10th Amendment by usurpring powers “reserved
to the States.” I think he is right, but I don’t see how he can
prevail in light of
Gonzales v. Raich, the 2005 case in which the Supreme
Court held that the power to regulate interstate commerce
authorizes ;federal action against people who grow and possess
marijuana for medical use in compliance with state law. Robert
Raich, who helped argue that case on behalf of his wife, Angel
Raich,
tells A.P., “”The War on Drugs is too sacrosanct a sacred cow
for the courts to weigh in [Williams'] favor.” ;
[via the
Drug War Chronicle]




