Tag Archives: Debt Crisis

Image francois-lenoir-reuters.jpg

‘Current EU economic policy is like hitting gas and breaks simultaneously’ – Professor

After the Euro created artificial booms and busts in the eurozone, as well as a competitiveness problem for the South, Europe is simultaneously saving and pushing a hugely expansionary monetary policy, which will not work, Professor Max Otte told RT.Otte envisions some countries leaving the Euro, including Greece and at some point Spain and Portugal. As for Greece, it should leave today rather than tomorrow, Otte said, though the Greeks will be in for three to five years of hardship.Doctor Max Otte is a professor for the general and international business administration and the author of the books “Investing Rather Than Saving” and “The Crisis is Coming”, covering the current situation in Europe.RT: Germany currently finds itself in a relatively decent position economically. Can it keep that up?MO: Germany is not at all in the driving seat. Germany’s economy is functioning, but Germany is driven rather than driving, by the processes that are going on. Unfortunately, I think the current system will last for a while because the European political elite have sworn to defend it whatever the costs.  And the costs are enormous. So really the current system is hurting Europe we have to make some changes, but I do think that the current state of affairs is going to continue for quite a while.RT: You say Germany is not in a driving seat. What can change that?MO: What we do right now is that we have a fiscal union which is austerity, which means we save on the back of people, of taxpayers. The Euro has created the problems because, as I predicted in 1998, the Euro will create artificial booms in some areas and artificial busts in others, because we don’t have an optimum currency area and that’s exactly what happened. Also it created a competitiveness problem for the South because wages went up and so on but they couldn`t devalue any more. That`s the root cause of the problem. We are trying to mistakenly correct that by saving, by cutting down public deficit which will not work in this situation. At the same time we are saving on the one hand and on the other hand we are having hugely expansionary monetary policy, so we are stepping on a gas pedal with one foot and on the breaks with another. And that`s what frightening. One would have to ask who benefits from that kind of policy.RT: If cutting deficits wouldn’t work, perhaps getting rid of the Euro would?MO: Getting rid of the Euro will be very painful. It would work in the long run because we had the perfect system before – the European monetary system which was just a right mix of flexibility and stability. It was a stable system, but you could adjust it if things went out of hand. So that was a good system going back there theoretically would be great, practically it would not be great because it would be extremely painful, but what I envision is that some countries will leave the Euro, like Greece and maybe later Spain a
1000
nd Portugal, Italy won’t. So in flexible union countries which are not ready should leave and that`s not the end of the Eurozone, quite the contrary it would strengthen the Eurozone. But the European political elite is basically applauding a dogma that if Greece leaves the Euro this means Greece has failed horribly. Greece is basically a failed state. They say if Greece fails, the Euro will fail and Europe will fail. All of this by itself is wrong and its connection is wrong. So we have to ask again who benefits from that state of affairs.RT: If there is a chance that we could see a champions’ league monetary union created? With Germany, Austria, the Netherlands and other countries.MO: There are some proposals out there to really split the Euro into a Northern Euro and Southern Euro. But that will not work for political reasons. You cannot split France and Germany then France will be insulted. That is just not politically feasible. If you do that then you might as well get rid of the Euro completely, so France will have to stay in the champions` league and this by definition would be very difficult. Also who is going to lead the Southern zone? Who is going to be a point around which they will rally? There are much more flexible and sufficient approaches to have individual countries opt out if they cannot comply with current policies. And of course Greece should leave today and not tomorrow because it is really clear – the policies are not working. They are having a austerity program which put the country deeper into difficulties. People are suffering. The only people who are saving are the financial elite. So they save the banks and the creditors at the cost of people. And that`s not right.RT: So you say it will be better for Greece to leave the Euro, take an extreme hardship for a generation and then benefit in the long term.MO: It would be extreme hardship, but we do have extreme hardship right now. I am not sure how much more extreme it can get. And it won’t be a generation, in my projection it will be three to five years. And of course if they leave the eurozone the European countries should stay together, they should give measured aid, they should give support project, they should support certain banks. It`s not the end of European solidarity. It would just be a healthier arrangement.RT: Looking at some of your works you seem to suggest that there is some problem with German mentality when it comes to taking things forward economically.MO: Yes, some of the factors in Europe are still the same. France is behaving like it behaved a hundred and fifty years ago, England is behaving that way, Russia, we will see. But one country that has really changed is Germany. It has a guilt complex still from World War II. We believe that if we just give up sovereignty and German interests we will have Europe. But the jump is a little short. Less Germany doesn’t mean more Europe. If Germany has bargaining chips it should use them, to create a stronger Europe, but I doubt that we will do it by creating the ESM [European Stability Mechanism], by supporting unsustainable arrangement with the Euro as it is, by doing a fiscal pact. So in this sense Germany should indeed assert European interests more strongly.RT: What are these bargaining chips?MO: The bargaining chips are not many anymore. We gave one away again which is the ESM. Still, the European increase in the capital of the ESM requires a scent of parliament and so on. But the parliament is lame, because the major parties in coalition government and outside always agree to stock up the capital. Parliament is not defending Southern budgetary rights. This is our last bargaining chip, Southern budgetary rights.The EMS is a big pot, its there European money will be distributed, something like the IMF and the money should float to countries with
e21
problems under certain conditions. At this point how it is constructed we are giving them money without solving any problems and the money is just flowing, exacerbating and prolonging the current unsustainable situation.RT: German Chancellor Angela Merkel has always been a big supporter of the Eurozone, saying it must stick together. Is there a chance that German fiscal decisions are being made on a base of political decision?MO: Mrs Merkel in that case is very much listening to the other countries. At some point she and Sarkozy said if Greece wants to leave it can leave, we are prepared. But that was a short blink of truth. But the dogma is that Europe has to stay together and it is basically a dogma based on wrong premises to blackmail Germany, to blackmail the northern countries for the benefit of large financial institutions, for the benefit of financial oligarchy, for the benefit of Southern countries and the elite of Southern countries.RT: But wouldn’t the Greek exit from the Eurozone be devastating for Germany economically?MO: Germany would be heavily affected if it left the Eurozone, that is why almost nobody is for it in Germany. It would be extremely costly. But so far in history every monetary union at some point has come to an end if there was no political union. So this union will come to an end, but it will be way in the future.RT: So you are suggesting that a political union could be what needed to safe the monetary union.MO: I am a firm believer in the fact that Germany should play its strengths more actively, should have more active stance in negotiations, but also pursue what most Germans really dream of the, United States of Europe. But then we have to start with parliament that is worth it, a government that is elected by that parliament, not a commission. We have to start putting together the true parts of high politics like defense, security. Those things have to be integrated and we have to have principal of solidarity of economic policies. So right now we are building a technocratic euro for the benefit of certain elites, for the benefit of the political elite, for the benefit of the financial elite.RT: Should Germany lead the way into convincing countries that would be in this United States of Europe to essentially give up sovereign rights.MO: Germany cannot lead by itself this German-French tandem. It’s a difficult tandem and I am not sure we can really make it work. But even Sarkozy and Merkel have learnt to work together, but Merkel has been too yielding. So I am not sure how the French-German tandem will work once Germany becomes a bit more assertive. But without French-German cooperation, this would not happen.RT: And the last question. How do you predict the Eurozone future right now?MO: Right now I am predicting that this unsustainable and to some extent, pretty bad state of affairs, is just going to continue. Nobody has the power to really solve it, but everybody is concerned not to let it disintegrate. So I predict more bickering, more economic hardship, more muddling through for at least another two years because the ICB is printing money like crazy. So we are going to sustain the unsustainable state of affairs for another two or three years Read More

Hayek Institute’s Barbara Kolm on the Eurozone Crisis

When it comes to the European debt crisis, “nothing has been
solved,” explains Hayek Institute
president Barbara Kolm. “The situation is as worse as it was at the
beginning, and we literally burned money trying to bail it
out.”Reason Magazine’s Matt Welch sat down with Kolm to discuss the
Eurozone’s financial issues and what it will take to bring Austrian
economics back to Austria.Kolm points out what Austrian economists have always known, that
redistributive welfare states do not work and that there is no
place in Europe for a one-size-fits-all model of government and
economics.Held each July in Las Vegas, FreedomFest is attended by around
2,000 limited-government enthusiasts and libertarians a year.
Reason TV spoke with over two dozen speakers and attendees and will
be releasing interviews over the coming weeks. For an ever-growing
playlist, go here now:http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1ECFFDA94AA8AA05Duration 5:03 minutes.Camera by Tracy Oppenheimer and Alex Manning; edited by Mark
WagnerGo to Reason TV for downloadable
versions of all our videos.Subscribe to Reason.tv’s
YouTube Channel and receive automatic notifications when new
material goes live. Read More

Image afp-eisele-photo-johannews.jpg

‘Summit in Brussels is going to solve absolutely nothing’

As anti-austerity strikes and demonstrations are gripping the worst hit EU countries another summit takes place in Brussels. However, EU summits do not give answers to real economic problems, Jerome Roos, a debt crisis…Read Full Article at RT.com Read More

European leaders gather for fiscal summit

Heads of 27 member states to meet in Brussels to discuss support for “banking union” and other ways to stem debt crisis. Read More

Image earth_day-300x150.jpg

21 Signs That The Global Economic Crisis Is About To Go To A Whole New Level

Just because the global economic crisis is unfolding at the pace of a “slow-motion train wreck” right now does not mean that it isn’t incredibly dangerous. Read More

Japan says it may purchase new Europe bailout bonds

Japan said Saturday it would consider buying bonds issued by Europe’s new permanent bailout fund in a bid to help soothe the eurozone’s crippling debt crisis. “We will consider buying them after carefully reviewing what Europe itself will be doing” on reforms, Finance…

Read More

Slatest PM: The Clear-Eyes-Can-Lose Edition

***We’ve revamped our afternoon Slatest newsletter to deliver a text-heavy recap of the day’s top stories to our subscribers’ inboxes. The most recent edition is below. Sign up here to receive The Slatest PM in your inbox daily before it is published online.***
THE DAY AFTER DANVILLE—At this point, you probably know what happened last night: Joe Biden showed up on stage wearing a metaphorical cape and did his best to save President Obama’s campaign. If you’re a Democrat you probably thought the veep turned out to be a real-life political superhero; if you’re a Republican you likely saw him as a slightly unhinged old man playing dress-up. If you’re one of those rare undecided swing voters who very well may decide this whole thing, well, we seriously doubt that a 90-minute VP debate was the only thing you were waiting on to finally make up your mind about who you’ll vote for on Nov. 6.
BUT BEFORE WE LOOK BACK—Let’s look forward. Now that the understudies are finished with their sole turn in the debate spotlight, the focus shifts back to the top of the tickets, where this race was always going to be decided. President Obama and Mitt Romney will face-off in their second debate next Tuesday at a town hall-style debate at Hofstra University.
MODERATOR IN THE MIDDLE—CNN chief political correspondent Candy Crowley will be running the show in Long Island. She’ll have a tough act to follow after Martha Raddatz drew nearly universal praise for using a heavier hand to control the political back-and-forth than did Jim Lehrer during the first presidential debate in Denver. What the 63-year-old’s hoping to see from Obama and Romney (via NYT): "Surprise me. Don’t make it so that I know what you’re going to say. That is what I most want out of both these guys. Sit back, drop your 12 points and surprise me with an answer."
INSIDE THE HUDDLES—Politico: "The Biden-Ryan exchange presents challenges for both presidential nominees. … Obama will need to match Biden’s substantive aggressiveness, while avoiding stylistic excesses that would look especially out of place for a president. Romney must revive his momentum from the Denver debate after Ryan did little to help the cause at the Centre College debate."
JUST RIGHT—NBC News’s First Read: "Obama is looking for a Goldilocks’ performance. Obama in Denver was too cold, Biden in Danville might have been too hot, and Obama, the sequel, has to figure out how to be just the right combination of assertive without being condescending."
HOORAY, IT’S FRIDAY! You made it. We all did. Welcome to The Slatest PM, where your afternoon host heads into the weekend on a Ken Jennings news quiz winning streak. Here’s the Slate office leader board from this week: 1) Josh Voorhees 499; 2) Dan Kois 453; 3) Farhad Manjoo 439; 4)David Plotz 438; 5) Rachael Larimore 433; 6) June Thomas 424; 7) Jeremy Stahl 385; 8) Aisha Harris 382; 9t) David Haglund 359; 9t) Vivian Selbo 359.
FOLLOW the entire team @slatest and your afternoon host @JoshVoorhees, or fill his inbox with your thoughts about what you want to see more (or less) of in the PM newsletter every day at josh.voorhees@slate.com.
FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS—THR: "Peter Berg, the writer-director of the Friday Night Lights movie and television series, is not pleased that Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has co-opted a phrase from the show for his campaign appearances. In a letter to the Romney campaign sent Friday and obtained exclusively by The Hollywood Reporter, Berg calls the use of ‘Clear Eyes, Full Hearts, Can’t Lose’ an act of stealing. ‘Your politics and campaign are clearly not aligned with the themes we portrayed in our series,’ Berg writes in the letter. ‘The only relevant comparison that I see between your campaign and Friday Night Lights is in the character of Buddy Garrity—who turned his back on American car manufacturers selling imported cars from Japan.’ Full Letter Here.
WHAT DICKERSON SAW LAST NIGHT—Slate’s John Dickerson: "Biden won the debate, but it was a qualified victory. He energized Democrats who had been down in the dumps since the president’s supine performance, but he also energized Republicans who found him rude and dishonest. Swing voters might have been turned off, too. But it probably doesn’t matter since they’re going to vote for the top of the ticket."
WHAT WEIGEL SAW LAST NIGHT—Slate’s David Weigel: "Liberals and conservatives respond to identical events, identical setbacks to their sides, in precisely opposite ways. Conservatives wonder if the data is skewed. Democrats just know that they’re screwed. After Obama failed them, liberals spent a long holiday weekend discussing just how badly he’d failed. They called into NPR to talk about why he’d failed. They blogged at Daily Kos about why he’d failed. Biden calmed them. For at least 45 minutes he laughed at everything Ryan said—a pitying, who-is-this-schmuck laugh. The first credible Republican spin I heard in Danville: Well, you know, that’s good for him, but not really good enough."
WHAT KAPLAN SAW LAST NIGHT—Slate’s Fred Kaplan: "It wasn’t as lopsided as Gov. Romney’s win over President Obama last week, but Joe Biden mopped the floor with Paul Ryan in their debate Thursday night, on foreign as well as domestic policy, though on one big issue—the drawdown of troops in Afghanistan—the vice president had his facts wrong."
WHAT LARIMORE SAW LAST NIGHT—Slate’s Rachael Larimore: "Hey Commission on Presidential Debates: Give us more reporters! … You knew from the very first question, when [Martha] Raddatz asked, directly and specifically, about the Benghazi attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens, that she was going to steer the debate toward substantive issues and demand specific answers."
WHAT THE REST OF US SAW LAST NIGHT—

The 2012 Vice Presidential Debate Awards (Danville Edition)
Five Big Dubious Claims in the VP Debate
Joe Biden Called Paul Ryan His "Friend" 14 Times, and Other Numbers From the VP Debate
For Good and Bad, Biden Is the One Who Has the Pundits Talking
Not Everyone Loved Martha Raddatz’s Turn as Debate Moderator
How the Debate Played on Today’s Front Pages
Paul Ryan, Unprompted, Makes Contraception an Issue in VP Debate
What Does Paul Ryan’s Bean Have To Do With Abortion?
Paul Ryan’s Bean Story Is Not Universal

ALL THIS DEBATE TALK HAVE YOU CRAVING A DRINK? How Much Drinking Is Too Much Drinking?
CHECKING THE NON-DEBATE TRAPS—
WaPo: "The European Union won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday, a choice that celebrates Europe’s post-World War II economic and political integration but comes as the 27-nation body confronts widespread criticism over its handling of a massive debt crisis that has become the biggest challenge of its existence."
WSJ: "The federal budget deficit topped $1 trillion for the fourth consecutive year, highlighting the severe fiscal challenges President Barack Obama or Republican challenger Mitt Romney will face during the next four-year term in the White House."
AP: "A Secret Service officer was arrested early Friday after being found passed out and apparently drunk on a Miami street corner several hours after President Barack Obama left the state following day trip to the city, police in Florida said."
Reuters: "The deadly outbreak of fungal meningitis expanded to 12 states with the first case confirmed in Texas, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Friday, bringing the total of cases to 184. The number of deaths from the outbreak linked to injections of steroid remained at 14 on Friday."
We’ll see you back here Monday. But until then, tell your friends to subscribe here, or simply forward the newsletter on and let them make up their own minds. Read More