China recently became the largest foreign market for Hollywood. According to a report by Motion Picture Association of America, box office takings for American films have grown by 36 per cent last year. A number of film buffs meanwhile say that the US regards the Asian country as its biggest competitor.“China, without a doubt. They look at Russia as a market that’s growing its business. They look at China as becoming Number 1 film market in the world within the next 10 years,” US film industry expert Sperling Reiсh told RT at Cannes, where an International Film Market is in full swing on the French Riviera.There’s no escaping censorship in China: the government censors all movies before they are allowed to be released. It’s a system of protection making sure that anti-communist and anti-Chinese films, as well as those deemed overly vulgar and violent, are banned from screening.Part of the ambiguity is that the ‘rules of the game’ are not clearly stated, and officials censor films by their own judgment. Each time US filmmakers release their multi-million-dollar productions in China, they end up running up against one and the same obstacle: strict censorship. Western films have to meet a set of unstated expectations and requirements to be among the 34 Hollywood films officially allowed in China each year.Django Unchained: ‘Nothing to replace China’s state censorship with yet’ Last month Quentin Tarantino’s slavery-revenge/action adventure Django Unchained was pulled from theaters in China, allegedly for ‘technical reasons’, with Hollywood insiders saying cuts were ordered by the local authorities.The latest installment of James Bond saga, Skyfall, also had several ‘sensitive scenes’ cut out.Some say censorship is the ‘least of the worries’ that foreign filmmakers shooting on location in China may be facing.“The biggest problem has been getting the film in and the box office out. Usually during the release there will be censorship as there are only two distributors in the country, China Film Group being the main state-owned one. But the biggest problem is that there are no rules. I heard one studio executive recently saying that the issue with China is that there’s always an issue in China. It’s never very straight,” Reiсh said.“One thing that the Chinese government and film industry is miscalculating is that US studios are run by giant corporations that have shareholders to please. Rules have to be made clear, ” Reich added.The all-time box office record in China was set by Avatar, which grossed nearly $225 million in 2010. The highest-grossing Hollywood release in 2012 was the 3D version of another James Cameron hit, Titanic, which raked in $150 million, making China the world record-holder for sales of tickets of the film.However, the version of Titanic shown to Chinese cinema-goers censored nudity in the movie – a shot was changed to show the nude Rose (Kate Winslet) from only her neck up. China’s State Administration of Radio, Film, and Television altered the film’s nude scenes over fears that audiences would try to reach out and ‘touch’ Winslet in the 3D version.That same scene – where Winslet’s character poses nude as Jack (Leonardo DiCaprio) draws her – was censored in China during the debut release of ‘Titanic’ in 1998, the Hollywood Reporter said. However, many in China managed to watch the original version on pirated copies; the nude scenes quickly became the talk of the town.An international publisher for China’s G-W Pictures, Oliver Dong, says that there’s “nothing to replace this [censorship] system yet with. If we change it suddenly, we will be daunted.” According to Dong, there’s a “huge gap between China and the US, in every single aspect.” “There’s some 20-30-year time gap between the two, with each country’s economy being highly related to psychology. Economy-wise you can be rich, but spiritually – not so well-off.” “I don’t think that the only competitor for the US is China; every country can be a competitor. It’s just that they don’t think another country can be better than they are. Several decades ago the US regarded Russia as its competitor, their enemy…” Dong told RT.China challenged to cooperate ‘not just with America’ A film expert from China’s Huanxia Film Distribution company says collaboration is much better than competition, at least when doing business together. “It’s important for China to cooperate not just with America, but with all other countries. All audiences, no matter where they come from, have something in common,” Ma Fang told RT. In 2012, the box office of films released by Huanxia Film Distribution reached 5.4 billion yuan (over $860 million), increasing by 500 per cent of that of 2008. The company says it has also boosted its investment in co-production films. Since 2012, 10 films have been approved for co-production with France, Australia, Canada and Japan, while 21 are set to be co-produced with by China and the US.When asked about censorship, Fang suggested changing the subject however, saying he would “rather not talk about censorship.” “We are a state-owned company, Fang explained, I hope the system gets better.” In the first quarter of 2013, Chinese films fetched a combined $570 million for a 69 per cent market share, leaving less than a third for the market for Hollywood, according to Variety.The low-budget Chinese comedy Lost in Thailand, as well as films like Finding Mr Right and So Young, generated over $488 million at the box office, according to Hollywood Reporter. The domestic market accounted for nearly three-thirds of ticket earnings last year.China also boasts the largest number of 3D movie screens in the world, at nearly 7,500. By 2020, the country is expected to overtake the US as the world’s biggest box office marketplace, with 25,000 screens set to go up over the next five years, according to Ernst and Young.China’s film industry ‘not affected by global economic crisis’ The CEO of Montecristo International, Cindy Nelson-Mullen, told RT that while many fellow US filmmakers have been hitting their heads trying to take bite out of the Chinese market share, her company has been lucky doing business with a number of Chinese companies without a hitch.“We’re small independent distributors, and our relationship with China has been on the production side. Our partners are a Hong Kong-based production company called Visual Magic. They are exceptional partners with tremendous amount of talent. They also look at it as an opportunity to get involved in the US market, as it’s not a market that they’ve been able to crack,” she explained.Speaking of which, the biggest problem of the US film business is that it’s a conglomerate, according to Nelson-Mullen.“The US film business is owned by five companies. An independent filmmaker has a very difficult task and a tougher road to face. Everybody is struggling, it’s a difficult time.” But her partner from the Hong Kong-based Film Magic, Kirsty Fung, reassures that China “hasn’t been affected by the economic crisis so far.” “The money is there,” the ambitious Chinese producer who studied in the US told RT. It’s the matter of finding and matching the right investors, finding the right theme and then creating a good product. It’s the same game, with an only exception that China is just more restrictive than others,” she explained.Fung says the real challenge for the US filmmakers is to create films that relate to audiences China. “I can’t say that the Americans and the Chinese are so different. Business is business,” she added.“If you look at China as a state, it’s been through a lot. It’s a country that’s not easy to match, with its own culture and its own diversity. There are over 1.3 billion people there, many of them are uneducated. To manage them is really difficult. The cultural transition within the society could take some 20-30 years,” Fung predicted.US film companies battle Chinese censorship with own restrictions According to the producers from US movie company The Asylum, the Chinese film market has already begun to change.“When we started dealing with Chinese film companies seven years ago, we came against censorship and the practice that those we were working with just didn’t pay the bill. Later we’ve instituted our own restrictions. We had no problems since we’ve started asking to see a copy of the censorship failure letter explaining that this doesn’t pass the censorship because it doesn’t have any artistic value,” Paul Bales told RT. Bales and his partner David Rimawi believe that although the economic crisis in America has stepped back, other countries are not immune to the echoing consequences of the global slowdown.“From our perspective, the worst is over for the US. Economy has recovered to an extent; business has stabilized. But now recession that we were in a couple of years ago is reaching the rest of the world, and Europe,” Bales said.In 2012 box office revenues reached $10.6 billion in North America; attendance rose 6 per cent for the first time in many years. Meanwhile, box-office revenues in Italy went down by 8 per cent and 6.5 per cent in Spain, according to the European Audiovisual Observatory.Film buffs from The Asylum note that while everyone is talking about business opportunities of doing business with BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – with their lucrative emerging markets, they are in fact “more difficult to work with than any others.” “I wonder whether when the US started off in the 1700s everyone said, ‘Oh gosh, the Americans… they are the worst!’” Bales said.Valeria Paikova, RT, Cannes … Read More
The Alex Jones Show – Friday, May 10, 2013 (Full Show): Holland Vandennieuwenhof (A Noble Lie)
http://www.youtube.com/v/FBGHThgyETs?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata Read this article: The Alex Jones Show – Friday, May 10, 2013 (Full Show): Holland Vandennieuwenhof (A Noble Lie)
‘Israel prefers US to do the job in Iran’
The Israeli intelligence expert argues that Tel Aviv’s possible strike on Iran is highly unlikely.RT: How involved are Israeli spies inside Iran?Yossi Melman: Iran is considered by the Israeli government and intelligence as the number one priority and therefore there is a lot of intelligence involved in order to get information. But when you say Israeli spies it doesn’t necessarily mean that Israel is recruiting and trying to send its own spies into Iran. There are other means of collecting information.RT: Is Israel behind the assassination of Iranian scientists and also hacking the Iranian computer systems?YM: I can’t reveal my sources but it’s our understanding that Israel was behind it. It’s based on some logic that it was a pattern identified with previous operations in other parts of the world. It’s part of the Mossad tradition in some rare cases to carry out its assassination attempts, and some other information which I don’t want to detail.RT: The western world tried to use diplomacy to prevent North Korea from acquiring nuclear power, but it didn’t help. Do you think it’s the same situation with Iran?YM: This is the point. Iran wants nuclear weapons for various reasons. They want to have hegemony in the region. Nuclear weapons in the hands of a country means national pride, scientific infrastructure, technological development. But also it gives the regime guarantees of survival. We see the North Korean example. They have developed nuclear weapons. They even tested it though unsuccessfully. But they know that if you have nuclear weapons no one is messing with you. This is the precedent, and Iran wants to repeat it. Diplomacy has failed with North Korea and is also failing with Iran.RT: Do you think Israel is trying to maneuver the US to attack Iran?YM: I wouldn’t use the word maneuver. Israel wants America to attack Iran as a last resort. If diplomacy fails, and it has failed so far, if the sanctions aren’t working. At the end of the day Iran wouldn’t cave in to the pressure and would assemble a bomb. In such a case Israel prefers the US to do the job not only because it’s more convenient. Above all the US has the capability to inflict a major blow on Iran’s nuclear sites, while Israel’s capabilities are very limited.RT: What do you think was happening behind the scenes during President Obama’s recent visit to Israel? Who exactly was putting pressure on who vis-à-vis Iran?YM: I think Obama simply asked Israel not to do anything not coordinated with Washington. In other words, not to attack Iran unless it is coordinated with the US. RT: Could Israel carry out an attack without coordination?YM: I don’t believe so. I wrote it in my book, I’ve been writing it in my newspaper articles. I don’t think Israel will attack Iran, because Israel’s capabilities are limited. We can do it, but the damage we can inflict upon Iran and its nuclear sites is very limited. The big question is the if the damage would be that low that Iran will be able to rebuild its nuclear sites in 12-18 months then I think it’s not worth taking the risk.RT: What would be the difference between an Israeli strike on Iran today as opposed to the strikes Israel carried out on Syria in 2007 and on Iraq in 1980s.YM: Huge difference. Syria was taken by surprise. There was one target. The distance was very short. Not much armament to be carried. Israel was confident that all its airplanes would return home safe. With Iran it’s the opposite. The distance is longer. Israel doesn’t have enough aircraft to carry out an effective attack on Iran. Iran would certainly retaliate and maybe drag Israel into a long conflict.RT: At the same time when Israel carried out those strikes it was very quiet about the operation. As you say these were surprise operations. Now there is a lot of noise happening around the possible Israeli attacks on Iran. Could that suggest that the Israelis are concerned that they might not in fact be able to carry out a successful strike?YM: That’s the argument. If you want to carry out an operation you don’t talk and especially at the level of the Israeli leaders. Netanyahu has been talking about it. That is one reason why I don’t think Israel would attack Iran.RT: The former Mossad director Meir Dagan publicly said that he was against a strike on Iran. What was he offering instead?YM: They said there should be a more covert operation to try to slow down Iranian nuclear sites, but above all Israel has to coordinate such operations with the US and the international community. Israel shouldn’t take the lead in the Iranian case. Dagan’s argument is, if Israel attacks Iran the damage will be limited, Iran will be able to rebuild its nuclear capacity and will use this attack as a justification for building nuclear sites. They would have said: ‘You see, we need nuclear weapons because we were attacked’.RT: When you wrote a book did you have any censorship problems? You don’t talk too much about Kidon, the Mossad unit that was allegedly in charge of overseas operations. Why not?YM: Well, the book was written by two of us – by me and an American journalist. My chapters were censored because any Israeli is obliged to do it, while my co-author didn’t have to. But I think we have this is the book. We are very proud of a chapter talking about the Kidon unit, which is the spearhead of Mossad special operations.RT: Does Mossad get away with some of the operations because of these Israeli censorship laws?YM: No, it has nothing to do with it. If Mossad is conducting an operation abroad and it is revealed outside Israel the censorship doesn’t work. The international media can write about Mossad overseas operations as long as they are informed. On the other hand the Israeli media is subjected to this censorship. I have said many times that it should be lifted.RT: The Israeli journalist sometimes have to rely on foreign reports to quote on what is happening inside Israel. Do you think that the Prisoner X incident brought to the fore the shortcomings of the censorship laws in this country?YM: Absolutely. The example of Prisoner X, the Australian who was recruited by Mossad, was arrested for betraying the country, and committed suicide, shows how the censorship is working. Don’t forget about the gag order, because of which we journalists cannot write about some issues. I tried to fight a gag order when Prisoner X was still alive, I went to the courts, and I lost the case. I was kicked out by the judges, who said that the ruling would remain intact. But it showed the failure of the system, because the only ones who didn’t know anything about the Prisoner X were the Israeli public.RT: Does that mean that there are other people who could be locked up?YM: One of the damages the Prisoner X case did to Israel is that it worsened its image as a free democratic society.RT: Is there a trust in the relationship between the Israeli and American intelligence?YM: We exchange information and assessments. Sometimes we hold joint operations with the Americans. But obviously the trust is not 100 percent. There is always a kind of mistrust because you don’t share even with your best friend everything you possess.RT: Have the Israeli enemies ever managed to plant agents within the Israeli government?YM: The answer is yes. Our history has a lot of such cases. All-in-all these are rare cases because the general trend is that Israeli society is difficult to penetrate due to a great sense of patriotism in the country. It’s a very homogenous society. Israel is more difficult to crack than other countries. … Read More
Iran ‘has tripled’ uranium-enriching centrifuges at Natanz plant
They added that the machines – which total more than 600 – are not yet producing enriched uranium and some may only be partially installed. Two of the diplomats told AP that International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) experts visiting the site were also uncertain about their operating ability, because they were not permitted to get a close enough look. Western countries skeptical of Iran’s nuclear intentions have already raised concern that the machines would enable Tehran to speed up atomic activity. The US and its allies have accused Iran of using its nuclear program to develop nuclear bombs. “It is clear Iran can build them. The question is how many and how good are they,” a Western envoy told Reuters. Despite claims from the US and its allies, the Islamic Republic insists it has no interest in nuclear weapons, and says it’s enriching uranium for purely peaceful purposes, such as nuclear power. Tehran also maintains it has a right to do so under international law.Iran announced last month that it would build around3,000 advanced centrifuges, refusing to bow down to Western pressure to curb its uranium enrichment.Although Tehran is still far off its target number, a diplomatic source estimated that 500-600 so-called IR-2m centrifuges and empty centrifuge casings had now been put into place at the Natanz facility.The number of centrifuges that Iran can make depends on whether it has all the necessary parts and materials, according to nuclear expert Mark Hibbs of the Carnegie Endowment think-tank.“It is possible they have accumulated an inventory of these things,” he told Reuters.Meanwhile, tensions continue to boil between the US and Iran, as Washington continues to threaten Iran with sanctions. “The United States and the international community remain committed to maintaining pressure on the Iranian regime until it fully addresses concerns about its nuclear program,” US Secretary of State John Kerry said in a statement last month.“The message to the Iranian regime from the international community is clear: take concrete actions to satisfy the concerns of the international community, or face increasing isolation and pressure,” he said.Israel has been just as aggressive with its threats, refusing to rule out the possibility of a military strike against Iran.On Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reiterated his position, saying that“tough sanctions” currently imposed on Iran might not be enough to prevent it from obtaining nuclear weapon capabilities.His thoughts were echoed by Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon, who called Iran’s nuclear program“the most significant threat” to the world.“The Western states must understand that only assertive action will curb the threat. Only forcing the Iranian regime to choose between a bomb or survival will bring Iran to halt the project,” he said.Earlier on Tuesday, Israeli Chief of Staff, Lieutenant General Benny Gantz, said the country’s military was capable of attacking Iran on its own without foreign support.When asked in a public radio interview if the military could target Iran alone – without the support of countries such as the United States – Gantz replied,“Yes, absolutely.” “We have our plans and forecasts…if the time comes we’ll decide” on whether to take military action, he said.Also on Tuesday, a US senate committee passed Resolution 65, stating that the country will authorize the usage of military force to Israel in“defense of its territory, people, and existence.” The bill also states that the US is committed to lending diplomatic and economic support to Israel.Iran and a group of international negotiators known as the P5+1 held their latest round of nuclear talks in Kazakhstan earlier this month. However, the meeting failed to produce a breakthrough.Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said after the talks that Moscow is against the West’s unilateral sanctions on Iran, calling this stance … Read More
Steve Emerson Gets It Wrong–Again
Why was the “Saudi national,” a young man who was injured at the Boston Marathon bombing, considered a suspect? Enter “terrorism expert” Steve Emerson, who continues to make the media rounds despite a checkered history. … Read More
Ten tips for the perfect Swedish cover letter
Wondering how to write a cover letter that will convince employers in Sweden they’ve found the candidate they’re looking for? The Local asks a Swedish HR expert about crafting a winning letter. … Read More





