The training group behind a “zombie apocalypse” exercise ripped by Republican Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) pushed back against his criticism, KNSD-TV reported Friday. “It’s been insinuated that Homeland Security and taxpayer money was used to fund the summit and that’s where…
Republicans Likely to Stick With Medicare Cuts Romney Criticized
Mitt
Romney’s presidential campaign featured frequent attacks on
President Obama for cutting $716 billion out of Medicare. Romney
made
ads criticizing the president for the cuts, and pegged Obama as
the only president who has cut Medicare. “When you see your friends
with signs that say keep your hands off our Medicare,” Romney
said ;last
year, “they are absolutely right.”Well, anyone who liked that
line ;may be disappointed. The cuts are back. And this time
it’s Republicans who are proposing them. Again. ;
The attacks were politically convenient, and seemed with
resonate with seniors. But they never made much sense. In part
that’s because Romney was simultaneously pretending to be running
as someone who wanted to cut spending and reform health care
entitlements. An even bigger reason, though, is that Romney’s own
running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan, the GOP Chair of the House Budget
Committee, had proposed those exact same cuts in budgets that he
and most of the House Republicans had voted for.
Romney promised to nix Obama’s Medicare cuts, and restore
spending to the program. ;But now it looks like Rep. Ryan will
once again propose to keep those cuts in place. The Hill
reports that Republicans on the Budget Committee expected that
the cuts will remain in the next GOP budget, despite their
prominence in the campaign. ;
Stories like these tell you something about the lack of a strong
policy vision in the Romney campaign, as well as the willingness of
other Republicans to follow along, despite the campaign’s
weaknesses. More than that, they ;offer a reminder that
Romney’s line of attack was always a gamble for entitlement
reformers. And at this point it’s clear that it was one that didn’t
pay off. ;
No, Romney wasn’t the first Republican to run against cutting
Medicare, and I suspect he won’t be the last. But Romney’s attacks,
combined with his frustratingly non-specific Medicare reform
proposal, helped position the GOP as a party defending
against cuts and changes to Medicare. The party that won’t
make cuts, that wants the government to keep its hands off
Medicare, not the party that wants to transform and reform the
nation’s biggest long-term fiscal problem. ;
In this case, I suspect that Republicans will just ignore what
Romney said during the campaign and proceed to include the $716
billion in cuts in future budgets. But I also suspect that if the
time comes to negotiate more substantial Medicare reform, the GOP
will have Romney’s words thrown back at them. ;
How the GOP became so unreasonable on taxes
On Sunday’s “Meet the Press,” Claire McCaskill pointed out that she’d met Grover Norquist for the first time backstage, then asked a pretty good question: “Who is he?”Her point is that Norquist’s visibility and reputation dramatically exceeds his actual political clout. It’s understandable how this has happened. Republicans have evolved over the past three decades into a staunchly anti-tax party, and Norquist is a colorful and endlessly quotable symbol of this absolutism – one who happens to live and work in close proximity to much of the national political press corps. So he gets an awful lot of face time on television and it can sometimes seem as if he and his anti-tax pledge are the reason no Republican member of Congress has voted for a tax hike in over two decades.But, as Tim Noah wrote last week, Norquist’s actual power in Washington and within the GOP is illusory. In terms of stature and public prominence, he’s been a major beneficiary of the party’s opposition to tax increases – but he hasn’t been the driving force behind it. The real story of the GOP’s modern evolution on taxes played out in several stages, from the late 1970s to the early 1990s.Continue Reading… … Read More
Sheldon Adelson Spent Far More On Campaign Than Previously Known
WASHINGTON — Casino magnate Sheldon Adelson vowed to spend as much as $100 million to defeat President Barack Obama and help the GOP take control of Congress. According to two GOP fundraisers with close ties to the Las Vegas billionaire, he made good on that promise — and then some. Adelson ultimately upped the ante, spending closer to a previously unreported $150 million, the fundraisers said.Adelson, a fierce critic of Obama’s foreign and domestic policies, has said that his humongous spending was spurred chiefly by his fear that a second Obama term would bring “vilification of people that were against him.” As that second term begins, Adelson’s international casino empire faces a rough road, with two federal criminal investigations into his business.This coming week, Adelson plans to visit Washington, according to three separate GOP sources familiar with his travel schedule. While here, he’s arranged Hill meetings with at least one House GOP leader in which he is expected to discuss key issues, including possible changes to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the anti-bribery law that undergirds one federal probe into his casino network, according to a Republican attorney with knowledge of his plans.Read More…
More on Campaign Finance
Harris-Perry guest: ‘Underlying civil war’ will ‘break out’ among GOP in 2016
On MSNBC’s Melissa Harris-Perry on Sunday, the host “begged for forgiveness” for already beginning speculation o the 2016 GOP race for president as her roundtable of guests speculated on which Republicans would take a shot at the open seat. Harris-Perry threw out a range of…


