Tag Archives: Hollywood

Image china-censorship-freaking-hollywood.jpg

Lights! Camera! Censorship! Hollywood fed up with Chinese ‘brick wall’

China recently became the largest foreign market for Hollywood. According to a report by Motion Picture Association of America, box office takings for American films have grown by 36 per cent last year. A number of film buffs meanwhile say that the US regards the Asian country as its biggest competitor.“China, without a doubt. They look at Russia as a market that’s growing its business. They look at China as becoming Number 1 film market in the world within the next 10 years,” US film industry expert Sperling Reiсh told RT at Cannes, where an International Film Market is in full swing on the French Riviera.There’s no escaping censorship in China: the government censors all movies before they are allowed to be released. It’s a system of protection making sure that anti-communist and anti-Chinese films, as well as those deemed overly vulgar and violent, are banned from screening.Part of the ambiguity is that the ‘rules of the game’ are not clearly stated, and officials censor films by their own judgment. Each time US filmmakers release their multi-million-dollar productions in China, they end up running up against one and the same obstacle: strict censorship. Western films have to meet a set of unstated expectations and requirements to be among the 34 Hollywood films officially allowed in China each year.Django Unchained: ‘Nothing to replace China’s state censorship with yet’ Last month Quentin Tarantino’s slavery-revenge/action adventure Django Unchained was pulled from theaters in China, allegedly for ‘technical reasons’, with Hollywood insiders saying cuts were ordered by the local authorities.The latest installment of James Bond saga, Skyfall, also had several ‘sensitive scenes’ cut out.Some say censorship is the ‘least of the worries’ that foreign filmmakers shooting on location in China may be facing.“The biggest problem has been getting the film in and the box office out. Usually during the release there will be censorship as there are only two distributors in the country, China Film Group being the main state-owned one. But the biggest problem is that there are no rules. I heard one studio executive recently saying that the issue with China is that there’s always an issue in China. It’s never very straight,” Reiсh said.“One thing that the Chinese government and film industry is miscalculating is that US studios are run by giant corporations that have shareholders to please. Rules have to be made clear, ” Reich added.The all-time box office record in China was set by Avatar, which grossed nearly $225 million in 2010. The highest-grossing Hollywood release in 2012 was the 3D version of another James Cameron hit, Titanic, which raked in $150 million, making China the world record-holder for sales of tickets of the film.However, the version of Titanic shown to Chinese cinema-goers censored nudity in the movie – a shot was changed to show the nude Rose (Kate Winslet) from only her neck up. China’s State Administration of Radio, Film, and Television altered the film’s nude scenes over fears that audiences would try to reach out and ‘touch’ Winslet in the 3D version.That same scene – where Winslet’s character poses nude as Jack (Leonardo DiCaprio) draws her – was censored in China during the debut release of ‘Titanic’ in 1998, the Hollywood Reporter said. However, many in China managed to watch the original version on pirated copies; the nude scenes quickly became the talk of the town.An international publisher for China’s G-W Pictures, Oliver Dong, says that there’s “nothing to replace this [censorship] system yet with. If we change it suddenly, we will be daunted.” According to Dong, there’s a “huge gap between China and the US, in every single aspect.” “There’s some 20-30-year time gap between the two, with each country’s economy being highly related to psychology. Economy-wise you can be rich, but spiritually – not so well-off.” “I don’t think that the only competitor for the US is China; every country can be a competitor. It’s just that they don’t think another country can be better than they are. Several decades ago the US regarded Russia as its competitor, their enemy…” Dong told RT.China challenged to cooperate ‘not just with America’ A film expert from China’s Huanxia Film Distribution company says collaboration is much better than competition, at least when doing business together. “It’s important for China to cooperate not just with America, but with all other countries. All audiences, no matter where they come from, have something in common,” Ma Fang told RT.  In 2012, the box office of films released by Huanxia Film Distribution reached 5.4 billion yuan (over $860 million), increasing by 500 per cent of that of 2008. The company says it has also boosted its investment in co-production films. Since 2012, 10 films have been approved for co-production with France, Australia, Canada and Japan, while 21 are set to be co-produced with by China and the US.When asked about censorship, Fang suggested changing the subject however, saying he would “rather not talk about censorship.” “We are a state-owned company, Fang explained, I hope the system gets better.” In the first quarter of 2013, Chinese films fetched a combined $570 million for a 69 per cent market share, leaving less than a third for the market for Hollywood, according to Variety.The low-budget Chinese comedy Lost in Thailand, as well as films like Finding Mr Right and So Young, generated over $488 million at the box office, according to Hollywood Reporter. The domestic market accounted for nearly three-thirds of ticket earnings last year.China also boasts the largest number of 3D movie screens in the world, at nearly 7,500. By 2020, the country is expected to overtake the US as the world’s biggest box office marketplace, with 25,000 screens set to go up over the next five years, according to Ernst and Young.China’s film industry ‘not affected by global economic crisis’ The CEO of Montecristo International, Cindy Nelson-Mullen, told RT that while many fellow US filmmakers have been hitting their heads trying to take bite out of the Chinese market share, her company has been lucky doing business with a number of Chinese companies without a hitch.“We’re small independent distributors, and our relationship with China has been on the production side. Our partners are a Hong Kong-based production company called Visual Magic. They are exceptional partners with tremendous amount of talent. They also look at it as an opportunity to get involved in the US market, as it’s not a market that they’ve been able to crack,” she explained.Speaking of which, the biggest problem of the US film business is that it’s a conglomerate, according to Nelson-Mullen.“The US film business is owned by five companies. An independent filmmaker has a very difficult task and a tougher road to face. Everybody is struggling, it’s a difficult time.” But her partner from the Hong Kong-based Film Magic, Kirsty Fung, reassures that China “hasn’t been affected by the economic crisis so far.” “The money is there,” the ambitious Chinese producer who studied in the US told RT. It’s the matter of finding and matching the right investors, finding the right theme and then creating a good product. It’s the same game, with an only exception that China is just more restrictive than others,” she explained.Fung says the real challenge for the US filmmakers is to create films that relate to audiences China. “I can’t say that the Americans and the Chinese are so different. Business is business,” she added.“If you look at China as a state, it’s been through a lot. It’s a country that’s not easy to match, with its own culture and its own diversity. There are over 1.3 billion people there, many of them are uneducated. To manage them is really difficult. The cultural transition within the society could take some 20-30 years,” Fung predicted.US film companies battle Chinese censorship with own restrictions According to the producers from US movie company The Asylum, the Chinese film market has already begun to change.“When we started dealing with Chinese film companies seven years ago, we came against censorship and the practice that those we were working with just didn’t pay the bill. Later we’ve instituted our own restrictions. We had no problems since we’ve started asking to see a copy of the censorship failure letter explaining that this doesn’t pass the censorship because it doesn’t have any artistic value,” Paul Bales told RT. Bales and his partner David Rimawi believe that although the economic crisis in America has stepped back, other countries are not immune to the echoing consequences of the global slowdown.“From our perspective, the worst is over for the US. Economy has recovered to an extent; business has stabilized. But now recession that we were in a couple of years ago is reaching the rest of the world, and Europe,” Bales said.In 2012 box office revenues reached $10.6 billion in North America; attendance rose 6 per cent for the first time in many years. Meanwhile, box-office revenues in Italy went down by 8 per cent and 6.5 per cent in Spain, according to the European Audiovisual Observatory.Film buffs from The Asylum note that while everyone is talking about business opportunities of doing business with BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – with their lucrative emerging markets, they are in fact “more difficult to work with than any others.” “I wonder whether when the US started off in the 1700s everyone said, ‘Oh gosh, the Americans… they are the worst!’” Bales said.Valeria Paikova, RT, Cannes Read More

Image 33.jpg

American billionaire calls for breakup of Sony

Notorious for in his power play breakups and dismissals at both Yahoo and Google, Daniel Loeb, the chief executive of Third Point, now has his sights set on Sony. Loed allegedly holds a 115 billion yen ($1.13 billion) worth of shares in Sony, which has a total market value close to $18.5 billion.Loeb’s hedge fund quietly accumulated its 6.5 percent stake, and has indicated he would accept a seat on Sony’s board.According to the NYT’s Dealbook, Loeb hand-delivered a letter to Sony CEO Kazuo Hirai in Tokyo.The Californian jetted to Tokyo this past weekend to deliver the letter, and to meet with senior Sony executives, government officials, and regulators.Mr. Loeb proposed divvying up 15 to 20 percent of Sony shares to existing Third Point investors and also promised $2 billion upfront in cash to ensure the success of the transition.”Our plan shifts that paradigm and we believe, if managed properly, it could result in as much as 60 percent upside to Sony’s share price,” Third Point said in a statement.George Boyd, a spokesman for Sony, said he had no immediate comment.Loeb wants Sony to break up its current structure and spin off part of its entertainment division, which includes its very successful Hollywood production unit, NYT Dealbook reported. Loeb also wants Sony to take a leaf from Apple’s business plan and cut costs by only focusing on a few core products.A profitable venture?Shares of Sony have sunk nearly 85 percent over the last 13 years, losing out to Apple, Samsung, and LG in the electronics market. Despite the slump, Sony remains a very reputable company in Japan, and still has a market value of about $18 billion.Though its sales were dormant over the last 5 years, last week, Sony posted its earnings at $458 million, down $5.7 billion year-on-year.  Sony’s operating costs yielded a $2.45 billion profit after a turbulent 2011 when it lost $5.7 billion.Sony has consolidated its American operations- in January it announced the sale of its 37-story Manhattan skyscraper headquarters, which it reportedly sold for a sticker price of $1.1 billion. The sale sent its stock soaring, up 12 percent, its biggest gain since October 2008.Revenue rose 4.7 percent, but investors doubt how flush the numbers are, since the weaker yen has boosted its competitiveness and value overseas. Last week the company forecast a 16 percent increase in profit, as it prepares to launch a new smart phone and television line, in attempt to out-compete its Korean electronics neighbor, Samsung.Smart phone sales are expected to rise to 42 million units, up from 33 million units, according to Sony.Pro AbenomicsDan Loeb, famous for his cut-throat dismissals and distinct management style, which has been chronicled as both ground-breaking and rude at the same time, may clash with the traditional, non-nonsense, Japanese company.Loeb has hailed Abenomics as a ‘huge game changer’ and sees potential in Japan’s market where many don’t.Japan’s Nikkei index has been steadily climbing, and has risen about 40 percent in the last year.“Under Prime Minister Abe’s leadership, Japan can regain its position as one of the world’s pre-eminent economic powerhouses and manufacturing engines,” the hedge fund manager wrote in his letter. Read More

Megaupload Asks Court to Dump The “Baseless” Criminal Case

Earlier this week Megaupload’s lawyers released a white paper accusing the Obama administration of being corrupted by Hollywood and other major corporations, and detailing how the entire criminal case against Megaupload is baseless.
In addition to this public attack, Megaupload’s legal team is also building up pressure in court.
In a new brief they argue that the case against the company should be thrown out, since the Government has more or less admitted that there is no legal basis to keep the company in criminal limbo.
The two parties have a standoff about “Rule 4” of criminal procedure, which requires the authorities to serve a company at an address in the United States. According to Megaupload this is impossible since the company is based in Hong Kong. The U.S. Government disagreed and said that it could find a way to serve the company, but this is yet to happen.
What followed was a back and forth exchange, with Megaupload requesting an end to the case and the U.S. arguing against it. In an unexpected move last week, the Government stressed the importance of the pending decision by pointing out that the wrong choice could put an end to the case.
In a brief filed yesterday evening, Megaupload’s lawyers respond to these claims by pointing out that without a dismissal “Megaupload will be indefinitely stuck in criminal limbo.”
This would mean that the company’s rights will continue to be violated by the current stalemate.
“As a result, Megaupload is trapped in a state of criminal limbo, where it is subjected to daily, irreparable harm from criminal indictment and the seizure of its assets, while being denied the benefits of the adversarial process and protections,” the lawyers write.
According to Megaupload’s legal team the Government appears to be contradicting itself. The lawyers note that the Government first argued that Megaupload can be served when Kim Dotcom and the other defendants are extradited from New Zealand, but that it now appears to be backing away from this stance.
“The Government has now changed its tune, claiming that because of delays in the extradition process, ‘it is likely that any ‘temporary’ dismissal would be permanent and contrary to the interests of justice’,” the lawyers write.
“The Government thus seems to confirm what this Court has already observed—namely, ‘that the individual defendants may never be extradited’ and criminal proceedings may therefore never commence. Given this reality, due process demands that the Superseding Indictment be dismissed.”
The recent briefs from the U.S. Government and Megaupload show that District Court Judge Liam O’Grady’s decision will be a pivotal one.
Source: Megaupload Asks Court to Dump The “Baseless” Criminal Case

Read More

Eric Holder defends prosecution against Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom

US Attorney General Eric Holder on Thursday denied allegations from Kim Dotcom that the prosecution against the Internet tycoon was launched to appease Hollywood moguls concerned about online piracy. New Zealand-based Dotcom launched a “white paper” to coincide with a visit by Holder to…

Read More

Hollywood special effects master Ray Harryhausen dies at 92

US-born “king of stop-motion animation” and special effects pioneer Ray Harryhausen died aged 92 in London on Tuesday, his family announced. Hollywood tributes flooded in for Oscar-winner Harryhausen, who is best known for his work on “Jason and the Argonauts” and…

Read More

Image california-pipe-bomb-buyback.jpg

California man arrested for trying to return pipe bomb at gun buyback

“This is not a pipe bomb buyback. This is a gun buyback,” Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck told CBS Los Angeles. “Pipe bombs are illegal to possess, illegal to manufacture.”The police chief explained that people can turn in their firearms with no questions asked, but that this does not apply to bombs. This past weekend’s sixth LA gun buyback event yielded about 1,200 surrendered firearms, most of which were handguns, rifles and shotguns. Among the surrounded firearms were also 49 assault-style weapons. California residents who turned in their guns were given gift cards in exchange for their weapons. The city spent $250,000 for the event held this past weekend.“Some of the assault weapons that were collected, these are weapons of war,” Beck said, adding that “a couple of AK-47s” and an antique “Tommy Gun”-style weapon were turned in.Los Angeles Mayor Antonia Villaraigosa said that “each gun that gets off the street represents one less opportunity for tragedy, one less weapon that can lead to the loss of life.”But the man who turned in his pipe bomb would have been better off discarding it on his own. In many countries – including the US – possession of a homemade pipe bomb is a crime, regardless of a person’s intended use for it.And although the man who turned it in had no intent to use it that day, he admitted that he once planned to detonate the Hollywood sign.“[The man] told the officers in the line that he had spoken to God that day, and God no longer wanted him to use that bomb to blow up the Hollywood sign, now he wanted him to turn it in,” Beck said.Upon receiving the bomb, police safely detonated the device and arrested the man who dropped it off.California’s penal code prohibits the possession of “any destructive device” other than “fixed ammunition”, and punishes violators with incarceration and/or substantial fines. Violators who are in possession of such a device can be convicted of a misdemeanor, face one year in county jail and a maximum fine of $10,000. Violators convicted of a felony face the same fine and up to three years in California State Prison.Police have not yet revealed any details about the charges this man faces. But if he receives a fine or jail time, his good intentions in surrendering the bomb will have been more costly than discarding it on his own. Read More

Chinese ‘Iron Man 3′ includes four extra minutes for milk drink product placement

“Iron Man 3″ topped Chinese box offices five days after opening, state media reported on Tuesday, but the modified domestic version of the Hollywood blockbuster has raised some eyebrows. The film starring Robert Downey Jr as the hero Tony Stark has earned 410 million yuan ($67 million)…

Read More