Tag Archives: Introductory

Image 10322042_m.jpg

What Should Online Courses Do With Angry, Suicidal, Oversharing Teenagers?

If a student threatens to shoot
his classmates (or himself) on the online message board for his
physics class, does that count as a campus threat? ;
That’s just one of the many questions purveyors of massively
open online courses, or MOOCs, are asking themselves. ;
Universities have traditionally been asked to play many roles,
and as the functions of those universities are disaggregated, the
question of who picks up which pieces is a tough one. In truly
massive online courses, like those offered by Coursera, Udacity,
and huge public universities experimenting with online learning,
teachers are not expected to read all the postings in a class
message board. But students still act like students—fighting,
falling in love, chattering about emotional problems, and generally
acting in ways that would be considered inappropriate in other
parts of grown up life.
Inside Higher Ed
talked to some experts:

Scott Plous, a
psychology professor at Wesleyan University, is preparing to teach
more than 70,000 students who signed up for ;his class
through Coursera, one of the popular MOOC providers. Plous, who
worked at a Los Angeles suicide hotline before graduate school, is
now trying to figure out how to monitor the message boards and deal
with students who post hate speech or are threatening violence or
suicide….
Plous is partially counting on self-policing by users, something
he may talk about in his introductory lecture. For instance, if
someone in a remote village in India is talking about suicide,
Plous hopes other users from India can suggest places to go for
help.

But some students (and parents) want more than that. Can online
schools provide traditional student mental health services? Should
they?
One thing I’m looking forward to is a disaggregation of the
babysitting and educating functions performed by schools at all
levels. If parents want someone to step in in loco to keep an eye
on their volatile teenager, why not let them pay for that service
separately?
For all the same reasons that it seems silly to pay someone with
a master’s degree ;$80,000 a year to supervise 5-year-olds at
recess, it doesn’t make a lot of sense to build psychological
supervision into the job of a P.hD. economist trying to impart the
principles of supply and demand to tens, hundreds, or millions of
students. Why not try a model where 18-year-olds who want to get
out the house while they pursue a degree shack up in hostels with
cooks and counselors while getting their intellectual jollies from
an entirely different purveyor? ;
One bonus: Older students who want to enroll will not have to
put up with the meddling of traditional campus institutions.
Via
Tyler Cowen. Read More

Image piratebox3.png

PirateBox: WiFi + USB Drive = Your Own Mini-Internet (Freedom)

(Tony Cartalucci)  Worried about draconian Internet laws? Creeping surveillance? The inability to share with others without being criminalized? The Internet is still a tool of tremendous power, but a deep rot has set in. We have caught it early and we are fighting to stop this rot, but there are other options we can begin [...]

The post PirateBox: WiFi + USB Drive = Your Own Mini-Internet (Freedom) appeared first on .

Read More

Image enhanced-buzz-7034-1355148989-3.jpg

Chelsea Clinton Plays It Safe In A Rare Appearance

At a nonprofit panel discussion, Clinton keeps to the topic of childhood hunger. Clintonland sought to “not just have it be about Chelsea,” a spokeswoman says.

Chelsea Clinton moderates a panel Monday morning in downtown New York City with leaders from the non-profit sector.

Image by Ruby Cramer/Buzzfeed

Former First Daughter Chelsea Clinton made a careful foray into public life in New York City Monday, at a time of peak curiosity about the future of the Clinton dynasty. But her mother’s ambitions for the presidency — and Chelsea's own involvement in politics — remained all but absent from discussion at the short, closely managed panel appearance.

Moderating a group of three leaders from the not-for-profit sector, Clinton, a special correspondent for NBC News, has yet to fully embrace the spotlight that she sometimes seeks and did not stray from the subject of childhood hunger — save to say that it was absent from the political conversation during this year's election.

“Our most vulnerable — our children — are not thought about in a coherent way, not only here in New York City, but in our national dialogue,” said Clinton during her introductory remarks. “And that was something I felt this summer, in full candor, during our election season.”

Clinton added, “In all of the conversations around what should happen with entitlement spending, what should happen with our national security, whether or not climate change was going to be on the agenda in any of the debates — very rarely did we hear a conversation about our nation's young people and our nation's children.”

Clinton then directed questions to her three panelists — Josh Wachs of Share Our Strength, Erica Hamilton of City Year New York, and Rain Henderson of the Clinton Health Matters Initiative — whom she handpicked for the Association for a Better New York event.

After about 25 minutes of discussion, Clinton opened the floor to the audience, a group of about 200 nonprofit leaders and businesspeople from New York City.

When asked whether Clinton would be taking questions from reporters after the event, Clinton spokeswoman Rachel Adler said, “We talked to ABNY about it in advance. We just wanted to keep it to the panelists and not just have it be about Chelsea.”

Read More