Tag Archives: Lebanon

Image mf.gif

"Nakba" Palestinians hope for life outside of refugee camps

||

Related

UN demands Israel stops settlement expansion 20/12/2012 02:36 CET
Settlers evicted from the West Bank 02/09/2012 18:34 CET
Palestinians mark “Nakba” anniversary 15/05/2013 01:35 CET
Israel PM Netanyahu ‘orders brief freeze’ on Jewish… 07/05/2013 12:45 CET
West Bank Barrier creates hardship for Palestinian… 03/05/2013 00:06 CET

Established one year after the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Jalazone refugee camp became home to Arabs from 36 villages in the Lydd and Ramleh areas of what had been central Palestine.

According to UN figures, there are more than 11,000 people living there – including Ibrahim Mahmud.

“After being a refugee for 50-60 years, how do you expect me to feel? We left our villages as 17-year-old kids and today I’m 83. This has never happened in history. From the day God created the world to this day – there’s been no mass departure like this,” Ibrahim said.

Some living at Jalazone wish the Israeli and Palestinian governments would put religion aside, like Hasan Abu-Sharif who said: “Any solution has to address the refugee issue, it’s more important than Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa. Al-Aqsa is a mosque like Mecca. We go for hajj, just 10-12 days. Al-Aqsa is just another blessed location. The prophets passed through all of Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Middle East.”

The UN has counted more than 1.4 million Palestinians, living in 58 recognised refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

More about: , , ,

Copyright © 2013 euronews

||

JavaScript is required in order to view this article’s accompanying video

Read More

Lebanon considered ‘liberal’ in Middle East but still arrests LGBT

Lebanon has a reputation as the most liberal country in the conservative Middle East, but even a night on the town for gays can end in arrest and humiliating sexuality “tests”. They might be less persecuted than elsewhere in the region, but outside a few areas of the capital Beirut,…

Read More

Image mf.gif

Israeli raids on Syria carry regional risks

||

Related

Syrian group criticises Israel over air strikes 07/05/2013 04:46 CET
Israeli officials confirm air strike on Syrian target 04/05/2013 13:45 CET
Arab Spring becoming an Islamist Winter, says… 06/02/2013 15:59 CET
‘Nuclear weapons against our beliefs’ says Iran’s… 04/02/2013 17:07 CET
Russia condemns reported Israel strike in Syria 31/01/2013 11:35 CET

Israeli air attacks near the Syrian capital Damascus have changed the dynamics of insecurity for the whole region, as Syria’s civil war transforms into a cross-border conflict.

Israel said it struck stores of Iranian missiles bound for Iran’s Hezbollah allies in Syria. Even though Israel has to plan for whoever might eventually replace the regime of Syrian President Assad, officials have said Israel is pursuing its own conflict – not with Syria but with Iran.

Iran, Syria and Lebanon form what has been dubbed a Shiite Crescent alliance. Israel must avoid Hezbollah getting missiles that might strike Tel Aviv if Israel attacks Tehran’s nuclear programme.

Israel has denied it is taking the side of Syria’s Sunni rebels, and it has proved it will do what it sees as necessary to prevent Hezbollah from getting heavier weapons.

But analyst Alon Liel said it has an additional, wider communication challenge: “If somebody in the region, especially in Syria or Lebanon, understands these attacks as a direct intervention in the civil war, it might be a real problem for Israel.”

Syria’s allies want Israel’s actions to be seen as intervention in the civil war. Before the raids, the leader of Hezbollah warned: “Syria has real friends in the region and the wider world who will not allow the country to fall into American or Israeli hands.”

An Iranian former commander of an Islamic Revolutionary Guard unit, Hossein Kanami Moghaddam, said: “As Syria’s strategic ally, Iran might send troops to Syria if Israel launched a bigger military attack on Syria. Iran can do that.”

Regional expansion of the Syria conflict is also high in ordinary people’s minds. Activists in the Palestinian city Ramallah said attacking Syria is tantamount to attacking all Arab countries.

Many analysts have said that Assad could ultimately benefit if more players got involved militarily in Syria’s conflict. Egypt, for one, condemned Israel’s air strikes as a breach of international law that it said “made the situation more complicated”.

Another complication is that, according to war crimes investigator Carla del Ponte with the UN, Syrian rebels may have used the nerve agent sarin. She did not rule out that Assad’s forces may also have used chemical weapons. Washington has made such use a ‘red line’, the crossing of which it said would meet an active response.

More about: , , ,

Copyright © 2013 euronews

||

JavaScript is required in order to view this article’s accompanying video

Read More

‘Prisoner X’ sabotaged spy mission to recover bodies: report

Australian-Israeli Mossad agent Ben Zygier unwittingly sabotaged a top secret spy operation aimed at bringing home the bodies of Israeli soldiers missing in Lebanon, a report said Tuesday. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation, which broke the story in February of Zygier’s arrest, detention…

Read More

Israel’s Syria Strategy to Weaken Hezbollah and Profit from Chaos

Shir Hever: Israel can take advantage of weakened Syrian state to attack arms shipments headed to Lebanon; long grinding civil war in Syria said to be in Israel’s interests Read More

Image israel-syria-bombing-crook.jpg

‘Israel bombs Syria to psychologically pressure White House’

RT: Unprovoked, Israel has bombed Syria twice in 48 hours – where does international law stand on this issue?Alastair Crook: Well that’s a very simple question: that’s clearly an act of war. I mean there’s no doubt about that, it was an unprovoked attack on a sovereign state and of course it is counter to the UN charter as well. It’s also an extremely dangerous exercise in doing this. However…it’s becoming a little bit clearer in Lebanon – from certain reporting’s we hear both from Hezbollah and Syria – that actually what we’re seeing is really more of a political event than necessarily a military one. In the sense that Hezbollah said earlier that there was an attempt by Israel to attack arms shipments coming from Syria, hence the Friday attacks.Then, [Hezbollah seems to] confirm that actually there was a recent, successful receipt of what they describe as effective weapons. And then we had a number of over-flights into Lebanon over the weekend. So what I think we saw is the failure to actually hit the arms convoy probably provoked the Israeli’s to decide to make a demonstrative exercise in Damascus. [It was] if you like, a fireworks, a pyrotechnics exercise to make the point that they were unhappy about weapons shipments coming to Hezbollah.RT: Given that Syria has strong regional allies like Lebanon and Iran, isn’t Israel afraid of provoking a regional war?AC: I think that Israel is playing quite a careful game, not necessarily wanting to go to war with Syria. But much of what its action is designed to do is to try and push Washington towards intervention in Syria. I think this is intended to put pressure not so much directly on the White House, but through Congress to change [Obama’s] red line. His red line being, he would only take action if chemical weapons were used in Syria. But also then, if the Israeli’s can shift that red line and push in for intervention, then maybe they can also create the atmosphere in Washington to push also for a change towards an attack on Iran. So I think ultimately, it’s much more a psychological exercise aimed at Washington than really a desire to start a multi-front war involving Syria, Hezbollah Iran and possibly other states.RT: Now that Syrian missiles have reportedly been pointed at Israel – do you see this tension evolving into a military conflict?AC: I think it’s very possible that it could evolve in that way. It’s a highly dangerous exercise because I think we’re approaching both the red lines of states such as Iran, Syria and Russia, and on the other hand, the red lines of the United States. I think that we have seen the timing of this as having been very significant as it comes on the heels of really some notable successes by President Assad’s forces on the ground both in the south, around Homs – severing the link between Lebanon and Homs – and indeed in the north. So in a sense, there’s probably an element of this in a desire by Israel to give an extra push towards the armed opposition in Syria. But there’s also the red line that we’re going to see with Iran. Read More

Image israel-syria-strikes-war.jpg

‘Israel not afraid of provoking regional war’

“If they were afraid of provoking regional war they would have not done this. The main attitude in Israel among policy makers seems to be that they didn’t expect Syria or Hezbollah or anybody to hit back for this. They thought that they could get away with it” he said.RT: Unprovoked, Israel has bombed Syria twice in the last 72 hours – where does international law stand on this issue?Larry Derfner: It seems that the US are supporting it, UK, France and Germany too. Nobody in the West has condemned it.RT: Given that Syria has strong regional allies like Lebanon and Iran, isn’t Israel afraid of provoking a regional war?LD: Evidently not. If they were afraid of provoking regional war they would have not done this. The main attitude in Israel among policy makers seems to be that they didn’t expect Syria or Hezbollah or anybody to hit back for this. They thought that they could get away with it.RT: No international action was taken against Israel over the raids against Syria in January. Will the lack of punishment encourage more strikes from Israel as and when it sees fit?LD: It seems that even the reports in the NY times quoting Syrian officials saying that there are at least 100 Syrian soldiers dead , I don’t think they wanted something like that. They know that hitting Syria was such a cost, they can’t go on and do that and expect that there is going to be no retaliation. So I think that maybe this may actually have the effect of retarding Israel’s future operations.RT: Now that Syrian missiles have reportedly been pointed at Israel – do you see this tension evolving into a military conflict?LD: It certainly could. I don’t think that Syria is going to invade on the ground, but of course there is a possibility of missiles falling on Israel. I don’t expect it to happen, but of course it could.RT: How do people in Israel see their government’s decision to carry out airstrikes on a foreign state?LD: Yesterday, before the news of Syrian soldiers being killed, they were overwhelmingly supportive because there was no retaliation. There was the attitude that Israel attacked the weapons that were heading to Hezbollah and got away with it. So the Israeli public was fully supportive of it. Now, if the reports of so many Syrian soldiers dead are correct, I think the Israelis might be concerned at this point, that the government did something that could blow back. And at least the Israeli public does not want to go to war against Syria or against Hezbollah. The attitudes in Israel with these reports of dead could change. Read More