Tag Archives: Magazine

Image drone.jpg

France to buy American drones for Mali operation

The news comes from the ‘Air et Cosmos’ specialist magazine, which reported online that a deal had been reached between France and the United States for the sale of two non-armed MQ-9 units. The French air force had already deployed a European-made Harfang drone to Mali, with the country now wishing to acquire more modern models quickly, although any purchase of the US Reapers directly from the manufacturer (as was done with Harfang) is expected to delay delivery by seven months. French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian is presently on a visit to the US, where he is expected to make the announcement, according to Air et Cosmos. The defense ministry has declined to comment. In a bid to curb the spread of extremism and Al Qaeda-linked militants in the northern parts of its former colony, France started a military operation in January of this year. The anti-government Islamists had spread Sharia law everywhere they went, and it is widely feared that if they are successful in Mali, the country will become a hotspot for extremism and the launching of terrorist attacks against European and other African nations. French efforts have since pushed the militants into mountain and desert hideouts. However, this changed the rules of the game in such a way that they now launch sporadic guerrilla attacks.Operation ‘Serval’ started with a deployment of 2,500 troops and the French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius declaring on January 30 that they would be out of there “quickly”. Since that time, that number has risen to 4,000, while the departure date had been moved up. Currently, the idea is that half will leave by July, when Mali holds their presidential election. Although Paris has begun withdrawal from the West African nation, ahead of the security handover to the International Mission for Support to Mali (MISMA), Le Drian’s recent visit to London paints a different picture, whereby 1,000 French troops will stay in Mali indefinitely, in case further problems arise. “This is the reason why France will remain with roughly 1,000 troops on Malian territory for an undetermined period of time to carry out counter-terrorism operations if necessary,” said Le Drian. As the battle against extremism in Mali shows no signs of abating, international donors have pledged €3.25bn to its rebuilding, as currently the country is in a state of complete destitution. Read More

Image mf.gif

Solna voted best place to live in Sweden

Solna, a suburb just north of Stockholm, is the best place to live in Sweden, according to a new ranking published on Friday by Swedish news magazine Fokus. Read More

Image c6bb0b5b7ce803685f4ea949415b8bfd

Washington Post Blames Gangland Shooting on Second Amendment

Gun control advocates hijack incident in America’s crime capital to demonize law-abiding gun owners. Read More

Image jacobs-interview.jpg

Big Brother vs Little Brother: Is filming your life a breach of others’ privacy?

Author and journalist A.J. Jacobs is a man who likes to test the modern world, he believes that becoming a human guinea pig is the best way to learn about something. He spent one year living according to the Bible. Another two were dedicated to becoming the healthiest human being. Most recently the editor at large of Esquire magazine spent 12 weeks logging his life, documenting every second with a miniature camera attached to his ear that looks like an oversized Bluetooth device. In an exclusive interview with RT, Jacobs says it’s only a matter of time before the overwhelming majority of people will be living this way, which is going to create all sorts of problems for people who don’t want public exposure.RT: For the past 15 years you’ve essentially made your life a series of experiments, having conducted at least 25 of them. Why did you decide to do this?A.J. Jacobs: I think it’s the best way to learn about something – is to become a human guinea pig. So, if I want to learn about religion, I try to live by the bible. If I want to learn about outsourcing, I outsource my own life. And I think it’s a good way to learn how to improve your life, because after the experiment maybe I don’t want to do everything I did during the experiment, but I always take away something that makes my life a little better.RT: Can you live a normal life yhile you were doing those experiments?AJ: It depends on the experiment, but sometimes it’s quite difficult, sometimes it takes over a year of life and drives my wife crazy.RT: Let’s talk about one of your most recent experiments. It’s the life-logging experiment that you conducted for about three months. You essentially were videotaping every minute of your life…AJ: That’s right. From the moment I woke up till the moment until the moment I went to sleep. I had a little camera in my ear, which was videotaping everything. The idea was that our memory is terrible and this was a way that I could actually remember. So, when I got an argument with my wife, and she said: “Oh, you never said that, that’s not what you were telling me before!” I could actually say: “Let’s go back to the videotape and see what really happened.”RT: How transparent can a life of a human being get when you are recording every second of your day?AJ: It is a bit of a problem, because we do things that are little embarrassing, but this is sort of taking the whole idea of Facebook and Twitter and taking it to its logical extreme. This is what we are going to be doing where all of our lives are going to be on the record. So, we are all going to be like politicians: whatever we say will be recorded. RT: Are there any destructive elements to that?AJ: Oh, yes! It has some big downsides. Just whenever I wanted an argument with my wife, that was horrible because it was a loose-loose. Because if I was wrong, then I was wrong. If she was wrong, then she just got angrier. So, there are problems with it. But there are also great things about it. I have kids and when they did something cute, I always have it on tape.RT: How do people change when you know that you are videotaping them?AJ: Sometimes it freaked them out, as some literally dived under their tables to avoid being videotaped. But it also had an interesting effect, because people acted a little better. People didn’t want to gossip in front of me. So, it will be interesting when everyone has these video cameras, which I believe is coming. I think we’ll see: maybe the world will be a better place.11th plaque: Multi-taskingRT: You also conducted another experiment called unitasking. Tell me about that.AJ: This was because I am a terrible multi-tasker: when I am on the phone, I am also typing e-mails and watching TV and riding my bicycle and so on… But the study showed it’s terrible for you and it’s non-efficient, it’s actually opposite of efficient. So, my idea was: let me try to do one thing at a time. So, if I am on the phone – that’s all I am doing. I actually blindfolded myself to actually concentrate on the phone call. And it was wild, because it totally changed my life. You realize – when you have conversations and you are multi-tasking, they are terrible conversations. But when you really focus, you actually listen to what the person is saying and you respond. It’s a bizarre concept.RT: As technology goes forward, there are many more distractions. What kind of stress is it for the society?AJ: I think it’s bad. I mean the scientists I talked to said it’s not a small problem. This is the 11th plaque (multi-tasking) – it’s making us dumber (studies show that your IQ actually goes down when you multi-task), it’s bad for driving (we get into accidents), it makes you more depressed (we are less able to empathize). So, this was my attempt to try to just do one thing at a time. For example, when I was eating (just trying to focus on eating), that drove my wife crazy, because she wanted a conversation. But I said: “Let me just taste the food.” It was a fascinating project!RT: Let’s go back to the life-logging. You downloaded all the videos that you recorded every minute of your day. But all electronic communication in the US (we are told) is recorded and stored for security purposes. Usually it’s the federal government of the NSA that has the recordings. Maybe it’s what people are searching on the internet. There are a lot of cameras on the streets that are recording us when we don’t know about it. What are the risks of that (considering you just did this experiment on yourself)? You have it on your videotape. But imagine someone else had all that video of you…AJ: That’s going to be a problem. I actually think big brother is a little bit of a problem, but I think little brother is going to be more of a problem. By that I mean other people will be videotaping you all the time. So, you do something embarrassing – someone else is going to be videotaping and put it on Youtube and you’ll be humiliated. You won’t be able to slip on a banana peel anymore without it going on Youtube.RT: That really changes the way an entire society can behave though? AJ: It will be fascinating. I think we are all already seeing it. People are taking much fewer risks. I mean it’s really interesting to see that people may get totally used to and just to realize: my flaws are going to be out there. What am I going to do? Which is I think what you see on reality television. RT: How about other people when they knew you had a video camera on be it friends, family or strangers? What was the reaction?AJ: It was mixed. Some people hated it, so they would cross to the other side of the street. Some people liked it, because maybe they wanted to be actors, so they did a little song or a little dance and they showed off for the camera.Seeing people in their worst moments is a very humble experienceRT: What are the truths that you believe people don’t like to know about themselves (based on your experiment)?AJ: That’s a good question… I think people… For example, when I showed my wife our argument, she saw herself losing control and she hated it – it was a horrible experience. So, seeing herself in her worst moment is a very humbling experience. It also has its positives and its benefits. I tried it with my kids as well. I showed them when they were throwing a tantrum and I would show them the video of that, and say: this is what you look like when you are throwing a tantrum. And they didn’t want to see it, they covered up their ears and walked away.RT: What were your biggest disappointments when it came to that experiment?AJ: One was – how hard it was to find footage, because I thought this will be the end of me losing things. So, if I lose my wallet, I’ll just be able to go back and look at the videotape and say: oh, I left it on the counter. But the problem is that I would look and it would take me around six hours to find my wallet on the videotape. And my wife would find it in 10 minutes by just looking the regular old way.RT: So, you became a little too reliant on this video, and not using your own mind or your own memory.AJ: Yes! I was becoming too reliant on the video. I was outsourcing my memory.RT: Did it make you filter yourself in anyway – just the way you interact with people? Did you end up filtering yourself?AJ: I did! I felt that this is on tape, so I am not going to gossip about my friend. So, actually I did another experiment, where I lived by the rules of the Bible. So, it was like living by the Bible, as I wasn’t allowed to gossip.RT: Tell me about some of the equipment that you used when you were documenting yourself.AJ: I used a small camera that’s attached to my ear (it’s called the look-see). And it could hold 10 hours of video. So, it was remarkable. There was another one that people use, it’s called the go-pro – and that’s a camera that you can sort of strap to your chest or strap to your head. So, I did that. It looked a little weird when you walked around with that.RT: It requires a great deal of a discipline what you do with the life-logging experiment, the unitasking experiment, you’ve done many other experiments. Where do you get that discipline from?AJ: I think it’s partly because I am obsessive compulsive (I have obsessive compulsive disorder) – so, this is the way I channel that into something productive instead of washing my hands 40 times a day. I may one day channel it into one of my projects.RT: Is your wife the same? Living with this and having the tolerance for these different experiments can’t be easy.AJ: I would say my wife is a saint. She puts up with quite a bit. Some are harder than others. When I lived by the rules of the Bible I had to have this huge beard. And she hated that, she wouldn’t kiss me for four or five months. But other times she actually liked it – like during the Bible period I became a little more compassionate and I would try to think about my neighbor a little more. She liked that. She is a saint!Immersion journalismRT: Is that immersion journalism?AJ: Yes! It’s called immersion journalism or method journalism, experiential journalism or stunt journalism. I’ve heard also all these names.RT: Do you think it’s the best way to write about a topic clearly is to live it?AJ: I think in some cases it’s the best way to learn everything. If you are going to write about politics, it’s time to become the President of the US and write about it from the first person’s point of view. But there are many topics, even something like fame. At one point I looked very much like an actor, who was having his 15 minutes. So, I went to the academy awards dressed as that actor and it was amazing, because I got to feel what it’s like to be famous. And I was signing autographs and people were telling me how brilliant I was. So, it was a unique point of view – I would never have been able to learn what it’s like unless I did it myself.RT: And have you got any suggestions for your future experiments?AJ: I get tons of suggestions. Some of them are good, some of them are not so good. Commonly some people say that I need to become the world’s greatest lover and do all the positions from the Kamasutra. And my wife says no way that’s happening. That’s sounds exhausting, I am not going to do that. Sometimes they make suggestions that I actually do like. There is one (which I already did), which tells me to do everything my wife says during one month, just to be a doormat of a husband. That was horrible. That was one of the worst months in my life, because she became drunk with power. RT: What’s your next experiment?AJ: I am actually still deciding on my next experiment. The life-logging was the most recent. I am still following a lot of what I did from the health experiment that I did, where I tried to have the healthiest person’s life. So, I spend a lot of my time on a treadmill. That’s how I work: I put my computer on top of a treadmill and I type. So, I’ve adopted bits and pieces from all of my experiments. And that takes a lot of time. Read More

Image kerimov-assets-swiss-charity-fund.jpg

Russian billionaire senator moves assets to Swiss charitable fund

“Kerimov made the decision the other day to transfer beneficiary rights to his business assets to his charitable fund, the Suleiman Kerimov Foundation,” Aleksey Krasovsky, Kerimov’s spokesperson is quoted by the Ria Novosti news agency as saying.The decision came after Kerimov was elected Senator to the upper chamber of Russia’s parliament – the Federation Council – from the North Caucasus Republic of Dagestan. According to Vedomosti business daily, Nafta Moskva, Kerimov’s investment group refused to comment on the news. Spokesperson for Kerimov’s charitable fund registered in Switzerland has confirmed that the asset transfer papers have been signed. According to current Swiss legislation Kerimov can’t withdraw his assets.Despite being registered in Switzerland, the fund mainly focuses on large-scale educational, medical, culture and social projects, Krasovsky told Ria Novosti news agency.Kerimov’s spokesperson did not specify which assets have been transferred to the Swiss-based fund. Forbes magazine estimated Kerimov’s fortune at $7.1 billion. He is listed as Russia’s 20th richest man. His major assests include a 40.22 percent stake in Poltus Gold (worth a reported $3.8 billion) and 17.16 percent stake in Uralkali(worth $3.63 billion). State officials in Russian will soon be banned from holding either foreign bank accounts or stocks or bonds abroad as a part of the Kremlin’s anti-corruption campaign. The bill passed in the lower house of Russia’s parliament, the State Duma on April 24, and was approved by the upper chamber on April 27, 2013.The bill will come to power after it is signed by the President. State officials will have three months after the signing to get rid of their foreign accounts and move their assets to Russia. Those not willing to give up assets abroad will have to quit their posts in the government. State and government officials are however allowed to own property abroad, if they declare it and explain the sources of the income used to buy it.Some officials have begun preparing for the new legislation for a while. First Deputy PM Igor Shuvalov, the top-earning official in the Russian government, has opened a‘blind’ trust registered in the British Virgin Islands and begun transferring his offshore assets back to Russia.The Shuvalov family offshore trust and income were exposed during last year’s campaign, after which President Putin introduced the foreign assets ban bill, aimed at strengthening state control over officials’ earnings. Read More

Harvard conservative tries to gay-bash deceased economist Keynes

Controversial British expatriate author and Harvard professor Niall Ferguson said on Friday that economist John Maynard Keynes’ ideas were fundamentally flawed and lacked concern for future generations because Keynes was gay and childless. According to Financial Advisor magazine, Ferguson…

Read More

Image widow-investigators-find-radical-islamist-computer.jpg

Tsarnaev’s widow under new scrutiny as investigators find radical Islamist material on her computer

With Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, alive and in custody, police are trying to determine what involvement, if any, Russell had in the plot to plant bombs at the finish line of the Boston Marathon on April 15. Russell’s attorney, Amato DeLuca, released a statement earlier this week saying his client was willing to provide “as much assistance to the investigation as she can.” The younger Tsarnaev brother told law enforcement that he and his brother were partly influenced to carry out the attack by the online sermons of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born Al-Qaeda speaker who was killed by a US drone strike two years ago. Dzhokhar also said that the brothers learned to make explosives by reading Inspire magazine, an English-language periodical published by Al-Qaeda. Police sources speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation said that at least a portion of the radical Islamist material was found on Russell’s computer, although they are trying to determine who exactly accessed the information. DeLuca has maintained that Russell, 24, had no involvement in the plot. She previously provided a DNA sample after law enforcement officials found female DNA on a component of one of the exploded bombs found in downtown Boston. However, Russell’s DNA was not found on the explosive device.  Federal investigators told The New York Times that they doubt Russell’s innocence, whether in planning the attack or evading police in the aftermath. Russell allegedly called her husband when the FBI released his photograph to the public but did not contact the police. She has reportedly stopped cooperating with authorities. Russell is known to have worked as many as 80 hours every week as a nurse’s aide while Tamerlan, who was unemployed but sometimes worked as a mechanic, cared for the couple’s child. When he was not taking care of the child, it’s been speculated, Tsarnaev experimented with making bombs using household materials. The police “increasingly believe” the brothers assembled the bombs in their home just five miles from where they detonated them, Reuters reported. FBI agents spent about 90 minutes Monday looking for evidence at Russell’s parents’ home, where she’s been staying since the attack. The FBI refused to comment on whether they found evidence there. However, it is known that they came up empty-handed Friday after searching four locations near the University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, where the brothers were thought to have practiced detonations. Russell was raised in North Kingstown, Rhode Island, where her parents still reside, and met Tamerlan Tsarnaev at Suffolk University. She converted to Islam and married him in 2010. DeLuca claimed Russell does not speak Russian so, often, she could not understand what he was saying when speaking with friends. The widow has not spoken to the press, but her attorney said earlier this week that Russell had refused to claim Tamerlan’s body, instead opting to let his relatives take the corpse. Rusland Tsarni, Tsarnaev’s uncle, the same who called the brothers “losers” during a media scrum, said Tuesday that he would claim the remains. “Of course, family members will take possession of the body,” he told the Associated Press. “We will do it. A family is a family.” Read More