Tag Archives: Paragraph

Image chdbits.jpg

BitTorrent Tracker Loses the Plot With Crazy Seeding Rules

Private BitTorrent trackers have rules for members to abide by. They are put in place to ensure the smooth running of the community and 99% of the time a site is a better place when people voluntarily follow them.
However, while many users simply can’t be bothered to read the rules, some site staff don’t stop to think what it’s like to be a user. A couple of dozen basic rules are easy enough to follow, but make them too complex and members just switch off, rules get broken, and no one is happy as a result.
Last Monday CHDBits, a private tracker specializing in HD content, introduced a set of rules for those members who use seedboxes on the site. These server-based tools paid for by members pump bandwidth into torrent swarms, making transfers quicker for everyone on the site.
Far from seeing this as a good thing, CHDBits felt the need to regulate their use with the most bizarre and complex rules the torrent world has ever seen. They include users having to send the site proof that they paid for the seedbox, along with a “legal agreement of usage as well as any other certificate / proof of rental from the original service provider.”
In order to fully appreciate the complexity of the rules a copy can be found here. Please have a read through now and we’ll meet you back here for the next paragraph in 20 mins.

Back already? Excellent!
Perplexed that we may have somehow overlooked the need for such a complex set of rules, TorrentFreak spoke with DroidX from Underleech.org, a company that provides VPNs and seedboxes to BitTorrent users.
“Sometimes things seem like great ideas at the time, similar to when you code your website with a barking dog on every page refresh when you’re drunk at 6am. The difference between the aforementioned and CHDBits’ new seedbox policy is the policy wasn’t taken down when they sobered up unlike your barking dog surely was,” Droidx begins.
“At first glance the policy sounds normal enough: prevent hit and runs and cheating by enforcing a set of rules. Sounds like a perfectly valid reason with good intentions, unfortunately everyone but CHDBits’ has heard the story about how the road to hell is paved. Simply put, these new rules are ridiculous.”
Droidx says that the ruleset basically treats seedbox users like cheaters (people who manipulate their stats to make it appear they have uploaded more than they have) when in reality they tend to be the users that go out of their way to help a tracker.
Rule 1A states that any seedbox used on the site must have a dedicated IP address for that user’s exclusive use. This, Droidx explains, is problematic.
“Maybe CHDBits’s haven’t heard but IPV4 addresses have basically run out, all remaining blocks are owned and users are forced to rent them from their provider or buy them at high prices. This is the main reason just about every seedbox provider in the business uses a shared IP. There is no good reason to buy a dedicated IP for every user on a box and end up charging more for the seedbox plan.
“Worse, I believe the reason for this is that CHDBits’ tracker software isn’t compiled to handle multiple users seeding on the same IP and rather than invest time in fixing the issue and recompiling the tracker, they are taking the easier way out and just banning shared IPs,” he explains.
As mentioned earlier, CHDBits also want their users to send over proof that they paid for the seedbox. That anonymity users hoped for when they signed up for the seedbox in the first place? Forget it.
Other rules basically dictate the terms that a user must agree with their seedbox provider in order for it to be accepted on the site.
“Requiring a minimum rental period of not less than a calendar month rules out the one week and two week plans some users strapped for cash use to get a quick boost. What is the harm in that? The user is paying their own hard earned money to do the right thing and help their account,” says Droidx.
Furthermore, if a user purchased their seedbox in a promotion, received a discount, or even won it in a competition, unbelievably that seedbox is banned from the site.
Of course, no draconian set of rules is complete without the punishments for non-compliance which in CHDBits’ case include being barred from downloading torrents for up to four weeks or being banned completely. Perhaps unsurprisingly given the madness so far, these punishments can kick in for the most minor of infractions, such as using a seedbox for its intended use.
“No mass downloading/ uploading torrents?? HUH? REALLY? Did they not get the damn memo of what seedboxes are used for!?!?!……. MASS SEEDING! That is the whole damn point for the majority of the users. They spend their cash to seed as much as they can to get their money’s worth,” Droidx notes.
But perhaps the best one (and you may have to read this twice) is that users’ seedbox use may not “Disturb the other users download/upload experience.”
“I can see it now,” says Droidx. “CHDBits’ !!! My torrents from your site are downloading TOO FAST! It’s using up all my connection and I can’t stream YouPorn! BAN the asshole with the seedbox who is causing this disturbing situation!”
As highlighted at the start of this article, rules are put in place to make a site a better place, but if they don’t achieve that then one has to question why they are there at all. Furthermore, rules that treat contributing members in this fashion are simply ridiculous and should never have been put in place.
“At the end of the day, with all these rules and regulations, I fear most users will say ‘Why bother with all this bullshit? Easier to download a cheat client.’ I for one, hope CHDBits’ rethinks this assinine policy,” Droidx concludes.
Source: BitTorrent Tracker Loses the Plot With Crazy Seeding Rules

Read More

Image mf.gif

Ground-breaking female rocket scientist sure could cook!

Easiest quiz you’ll take today: Let’s say an eminent scientist and inventor, an individual who worked on the first American satellite designs, dies after a long and distinguished career. Why would the first thing mentioned in the New York Times obituary be in praise of said scientist’s cooking skills? Did you say, because the scientist was a woman? You win! And by “win,” I mean, get to bang your head against your desk in a slow and methodical manner until the rage subsides.When Yvonne Brill, who died last week at age 88, was remembered in the New York Times over the weekend, the first paragraph of her obituary described her as a woman who “made a mean beef stroganoff, followed her husband from job to job and took eight years off from work to raise three children. She was also, according to her son Matthew, ‘The world’s best mom.’” It was only in the second graph that the paper of record got around to mentioning that stroganoff champ, husband follower and awesome mom Brill also “invented a propulsion system to help keep communications satellites from slipping out of their orbits.” Oh, that too.Continue Reading… Read More

From “phreaks” to Apple: Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak’s “eureka!” moment

Like the flap of a butterfly’s wings causing a hurricane half a world away, the ripples of unintended consequences from Ron Rosenbaum’s “Secrets of the Little Blue Box” continued to spread. “You know how some articles just grab you from the first paragraph? Well, it was one of those articles,” Steve Wozniak recalls. “It was the most amazing article I’d ever read!”

Wozniak happened to pick up a copy of Esquire from his mother’s kitchen table the day before starting classes at Berkeley in the fall of 1971. Rosenbaum’s article “described a whole web of people who were doing this: the phone phreaks. They were anonymous technical people who went by fake names and lived all over the place,” he recalls. They were “outsmarting phone companies and setting up networks that nobody imagined existed.” It seemed unbelievable. And yet, he says, “I kept reading it over and over, and the more I read it, the more possible and real it sounded.”

Continue Reading…

Read More

Image manufacturing-and-jobs.gif

Disappointing Economic News Likely a Result of Fear of D.C.

Yesterday, the
Institute for Supply Management reported thet U.S. manufacturing
fell to a three-year low. That’s disappointing news during what,
we’re told, is a “recovery” from the Great Recession. Why
manufacturing is shrinking again after a brief period of growth
requires a bit of speculation, but comments gathered by the ISM
point not just to worries over the fiscal cliff but anticipated
policy choices by the federal government that have business people
hunkering down for the worst.
In its report, the ISM points
to raw data gathered from 18 manufacturing industries, of which 11
are contracting:

Manufacturing contracted in November as the PMI™ registered 49.5
percent, a decrease of 2.2 percentage points when compared to
October’s reading of 51.7 percent. This is the fourth month in the
last six months that the PMI™ has contracted, and the index is at
its lowest level since July 2009 when the PMI™ registered 49.2
percent. A reading above 50 percent indicates that the
manufacturing economy is generally expanding; below 50 percent
indicates that it is generally contracting.

The numbers aren’t entirely negative. New Orders are in positive
territory, despite slipping 3.9 percent since October. And
Production is not just in positive territory, but actually
up 1.3 percent.
However:

ISM’s Employment Index registered 48.4 percent in November,
which is 3.7 percentage points lower than the 52.1 percent reported
in October, and is the lowest reading since September 2009 when the
Employment Index registered 47.8 percent. This is the first month
of contraction in employment following 37 consecutive months of
growth in the Employment Index.

That’s no surprise. You don’t need to employ people if you’re
winding up production, seeing orders slip and manufacturing less.

But why the sudden fall-off in numbers? The ISM points to the
reason in the opening paragraph:

Comments from the panel this month generally indicate that the
second half of the year continues to show a slowdown in demand;
respondents also express concern over how and when the fiscal cliff
issue will be resolved.

Specifically, a representive of the Petroleum and Coal Products
industry is quoted saying, “The principle business conditions that
will affect the company over the next three or four quarters will
be the U.S. federal government tax and budgetary policies; the
impact of those policies is not yet clear.” And a counterpart from
Fabricated Metal Products offered, “The fiscal cliff is the big
worry right now. We will not look toward any type of expansion
until this is addressed; if the program that is put in place is
more taxes and big spending cuts — which will push us toward
recession — forget it.”
You can quibble with the concern over spending cuts (I do)
without detracting from the overall impression that policy
uncertainty has businesses growing cautious and taking a
wait-and-see strategy until they know for sure just how stupidly
federal officials will deal with the financial mess. Why place
orders, stockpile inventory and hold on to expensive labor if the
government is likely to sabotage the works?

Much has been made in recent days of a
graph from BlackRock showing that market volatility has
remained low even as the Policy Uncertainty Index has
trended ever-upward. The manufacturing report seems to indicate
that policy worries are reflected in the economy, even if
not on Wall Street.
The people in Washington, D.C. may be lousy at most things. But
they can certainly muck things up. Read More

Image MakesHistoryComeAlive.png

The Dismal Séance

An actual sentence that an actual person actually wrote:
What would Lincoln do about the fiscal
cliff?

That’s Joe Klein striving
mightily to claim the award for ;Worst Essay Ever Inspired
By A Steven Spielberg Movie, a title held til now by an elaborate
Thomas Friedman metaphor involving Palestinians, iPads, and a
“bigger boat.” (*)
Klein’s next sentence, incidentally, is “The answer seems
obvious,” and the rest of the paragraph includes such gems as “On
the spending side, he would probably have to look at health care in
a new way.” I’ll spare you the details, but apparently if Lincoln
were alive today he would be a politically canny sockpuppet for Joe
Klein.
The actual point of Klein’s ;column is that “if we’re going
to resume dealmaking in Washington, my colleagues in the media are
going to have to get off the high horses we mounted when, in the
wake of Watergate, exposing ‘corruption’ became the surest path to
journalistic gold and glory.” You’ll have to judge for yourself
what’s most risible about that sentence: the idea that D.C. has
deserted dealmaking, ;the idea that the press is too much of a
watchdog, or the fact that Klein’s description of those watchdogs
includes the word “we.”
(* Note: Thomas Friedman did not actually write such a
metaphor. Or at least I don’t think he did. I black out a lot when
I read his columns.)

Read More

Image darylnote.jpg

Endnote of the Year

A quick postscript to my
review yesterday of Daryl Johnson’s ;Right-Wing
Resurgence: The book gives the impression of being
extremely well-documented, with multiple endnotes for what seems
like almost every paragraph. But when you turn to the actual notes,
you see things like this:

I don’t think I could have gotten away with that in the seventh
grade, but evidently it’s acceptable at Rowman &
Littlefield.

Read More

Don’t fear the fiscal cliff

For economy geeks, the New York Times headline on Aug. 6, “Fear of ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Has Industry Pulling Back,” was a punch in the face. For anyone hoping a recovering economy would ease President Obama’s path to reelection, the thrust of the article was positively chilling.You didn’t need to read past the opening paragraph to get the gist:A rising number of manufacturers are canceling new investments and putting off new hires because they fear paralysis in Washington will force hundreds of billions in tax increases and budget cuts in January, undermining economic growth in the coming months.”Everyone is sitting back and hunkering down,” said Kellie Johnson, the owner of an aerospace company in Torrance, Calif.The fear seemed justified. If Congress takes no action between now and Jan. 1, a massive package of tax cuts — including those passed during George W. Bush’s first term in 2001 and 2003, as well as an array of cuts orchestrated by Barack Obama — will simultaneously expire. Extended unemployment benefits will run out, and drastic, brainlessly indiscriminate across-the-board spending cuts in both domestic programs and national defense will kick in.Continue Reading… Read More