The budget request for the fiscal year beginning October 1 has called for $79 million for detention operations, the same as the current year. An additional $20.5 million has been requested for the office of military commissions, the military tribunals set up in 2006 for prosecuting detainees. The current price tag on the Guantanamo military commission is $12.6 million. A further $40 million is needed for a fiber optic cable and $99 million for operation and maintenance of the facilities.The Pentagon is also mulling over a request from the Southern Command to spend about $200 million for renovating the camp, which will include the construction of a new prison building for “high value” detainees, as well as a new dining hall, barracks for prison guards, a hospital, a “legal meeting complex” and a “communications network facility” to store data.The increased budget request comes in stark contrast to President Obama’s recent push to shutter the facility, where 103 out of the camp’s 166 detainees have been carrying out an unprecedented hunger strike for more than 100 days. Human rights advocates have placed the number of hunger strikers as high as 130.Thirty of the hunger strikers are being force-fed through a nasal tube – a practice which the UN human rights office condemned as “torture” and a breach of international law. Three have been sent to the detainee hospital for observation. Lawyers for Guantanamo inmates have also claimed that prisoners who wish to talk to their legal representatives are being subjected to humiliating new cavity searches.The 166 prisoners have been detained for eleven and a half years, the vast majority of them have not been charged with a crime, and 86 of them have been cleared for release.The detention facility already ranks as one of the most expensive in the world, costing over $900,000 annually per prisoner. With 166 detainees, Gitmo consumes over $150 million each year.Obama moves to shutter Guantanamo?Obama is expected to make a major speech on Thursday at National Defense University, where he will outline his latest plan to close the detention facility, as well as his administration’s drone policy, targeted killing and the war against al Qaeda.The president’s new push to shut down Guantanamo comes after Congress blocked attempts to close Guantanamo during his first term in office, when Obama signed a 2009 executive order calling for the camp’s closure.”Guantanamo is not necessary to keep America safe,” the president said at a White House news conference last month. “It is expensive. It is inefficient. It hurts us in terms of our international standing. It lessens cooperation with our allies on counterterrorism efforts. It is a recruitment tool for extremists. It needs to be closed.”However, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, the law that Congress passed and Obama signed in March to stem the possibility of a federal government shutdown, prohibits any additional funds for the transfer of Guantanamo detainees to the United States or its territories. It further blocks any expenditures on the renovation of any US facility on American soil to house detainees, effectively making it illegal for the government to transfer the men it plans to continue holding.It also remains unclear how Obama will win over both Republicans and members of his own party who remain staunchly opposed to transferring terror suspects to the US.While lawmakers have cited recidivism of released terror suspects as a reason to keep the camp open, in 2009 the Pentagon was only able to “confirm” that 18 former detainees – 4 percent of the camp’s population – had participated in attacks. A spokesman at the time said evidence of someone being “confirmed” could have included fingerprints, a conclusive photograph or “well-corroborated intelligence reporting.”Another issue involves the camp’s 86 detainees who have never been charged with a crime and have already been cleared for release.Earlier this month, Democratic Senator Carl Levin wrote a letter to the White House requesting that the White House appoint an official who will be tasked with relocating the dozens of detainees who were being held without charge.Levin, the Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman, said that although the defense authorization bill has restricted the administration’s ability to transfer detainees, a national security waiver provided a “clear route” to moving detainees to some third countries. Levin further urged Obama to find a way to close the camp without Congress’ blessing.“Congress has blocked it, so he’s going to have to find a way to remove the blockages of Congress, and hopefully he’ll let us know how he’ll do that,” Levin told reporters Tuesday.Levin told The Hill on Tuesday that he has yet to receive a response to his letter.Democratic representative Adam Smith (D-Wash.) questioned in an interview if the growing international outcry surrounding the hunger strike was enough to persuade resistant lawmakers to change their position on keeping the camp open.“It’s getting uglier and uglier at Gitmo…The level of embarrassment is growing and the cost is growing, so is that enough to persuade them that it’s time to change positions?” Smith asked.“We’re going to have that debate.” … Read More
No peace pipe: Native American tribes on warpath over Keystone XL pipeline
Native Americans are opposed to the 1,179-mile (1,897km) Keystone XL project, a system to transport tar sands oil from Canada and the northern United States to refineries in Texas for various reasons, including possible damage to sacred sites, pollution, and water contamination.Although the planned pipeline would not pass directly through any Native American reservation, tribes in proximity to the proposed system say it will violate their traditional lands and that the environmental risks of the project are simply too great.Russ Girling, CEO of TransCanada, the company that hopes to build the pipeline, has promised in the past that Keystone XL will be “the safest pipeline ever built.”The Indian groups, as well as other activist organizations, doubt the claim, saying the risks involved in the project are too high.In an effort to ease their concerns, officials from the Department of State agreed to meet with tribal leaders on Thursday in the Hilton Garden Inn in Rapid City, Michigan.Before the talks could begin, however, tribal leaders walked out, angered that the government had sent what they considered low-level representatives.In a press conference following the walkout, tribal leaders took turns criticizing the project, as well as the Obama administration.”I will only meet with President Obama,” Bryan Brewer, president of the Oglala Sioux Tribe, told the Rapid City Journal.Others mentioned environmental concerns with the proposed pipeline, which echo the concern of environmental groups across the country.Casey Camp-Horinek, an elder with the Southern Ponca Tribe based in Oklahoma, compared the pipeline and other environmental damage to the historical events that had decimated her people during European colonization.”We find ourselves victims of another form of genocide, and it’s environmental genocide, and it’s caused by the extractive industries,” she said.Charles LoneChief, vice president of the Pawnee Business Council, headquartered in Oklahoma, said the public was misinformed about the pipeline’s environmental risks.Unlike a traditional crude oil pipeline, Keystone XL will pump oil that is collected from tar sands. To turn this substance into a transportable liquid, oil companies must add chemicals that environmental groups warn are highly toxic.”That gets into our waterways, our water tables, our aquifers, then we have problems,” LoneChief said.The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has estimated that the Keystone XL pipeline will increase annual US carbon pollution emissions by up to 27.6 million metric tons – the impact of adding nearly 6 million cars on the road, according to the Environment News Service.Robin LeBeau, a council representative for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe based in South Dakota, pledged to protest against any construction, even if that meant standing in front of bulldozers.”What the State Department, what President Obama needs to hear from us, is that we are going to be taking direct action,” she said.I believe this is going to be one of the biggest battles we are ever going to have, LeBeau added.This is not the first time that Native American groups have spoken out on the project.Leaders from ten Canadian and US indigenous groups gathered in Ottawa, Ontario in March to protest the construction of pipelines.“Tar sands pipelines will not pass through [our] collective territories under any conditions or circumstances,” the tribes said at a press conference. … Read More
Upcoming Trans-Pacific Partnership Looks Like Corporate Takeover
Leaked documents appear to show that negotiators are writing provisions that will set rules that are binding on Congress and our state legislatures tell us what laws and regulations our own country can pass or enforce. … Read More
Anonymous ● Message to the Government of Ireland.
http://www.youtube.com/v/gozrTBOQWS4?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata See the original post: Anonymous ● Message to the Government of Ireland.
Washington DC considers $250k insurance for gun owners
The proposed bill, B20-170, would mandate insurance coverage for negligent and intentional acts in which a gun is used in cases other than self-defense. Even those who already own gun licenses would be required to purchase the liability insurance within 30 days of the effective date of the bill.The bill states that its purpose is to compensate victims of gun violence through the money raised from the licensing mandate, but critics have scrutinized the measure for possibly inflicting heavy costs upon gun owners.It is not yet clear how much a $250,000 liability insurance policy would cost, but if it is significant, it could serve as a barrier against purchasing firearms. Democratic Councilmember Mary Cheh, who introduced the bill, told WTTF-TV that she is willing to negotiate with critics about the cost.“I don’t mean it to be a centrifuge as a ban,” she said. “I want it to really be insurance.”She also added that guns “are instrumentalities that, if mishandled or allow others access or mishandling, can cause great harm,” thereby emphasizing the need for insurance to compensate victims.But there is also a gap in the proposed bill: if crimes are committed using an illegal weapon, victims would not receive any sort of compensation, since those who buy guns illegally would not have mandated insurance.The council committee heard testimonies on the need for such insurance on Thursday, but D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray’s administration does not currently support the bill. In a written testimony to the DC Council, the deputy insurance commissioner wrote that the mayor “is not convinced that there is currently a persuasive argument to support the need for insurance for firearms in the home.”Three gun owners and two insurance-industry representatives testified against the bill during the10 a.m.hearing, while the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence testified in favor of the proposal, the Associated Press reports.A number of other states are considering similar measures to the bill proposed by Cheh, but no such law has yet been passed in the US.Meanwhile, the state of Maryland has this week entered the ranks of states with the most restrictive gun laws. Gov. Martin O’Malley on Thursday signed a bill that will ban 45 assault rifles and restrict ammunition magazines to 10 rounds. The legislation also requires Americans who buy handguns to be fingerprinted. … Read More
Advocate: GOP-backed ‘workplace flexibility’ bill is designed to kill overtime pay
The House of Representatives passed a Republican-sponsored bill on Wednesday evening purporting to offer greater flexibility to working families, but the bill has been vehemently opposed by women’s groups and labor unions who say the only “flexibility” offered by the bill is given…
Comedian rips Mark Sanford: South Carolina has bottomless supply of duplicitous teabags
Comedian and political commentator John Fugelsang viciously mocked Mark Sanford on Tuesday after the former Republican governor was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. In a faux South Carolina Board of Tourism message, Fugelsang proclaimed “our bottomless supply of duplicitous…






