http://www.youtube.com/v/FEJedgRvQDQ?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata Read this article: Nigel Farage and George Galloway appear on special BBC Question Time Edinburgh 2013
Nigel Farage attacked by Scottish fascists
http://www.youtube.com/v/SqyeiKeu5eQ?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata Source article: Nigel Farage attacked by Scottish fascists
Nigel Farage Under Pressure in Scotland
http://www.youtube.com/v/8K2yzs8iGMQ?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata View the original here: Nigel Farage Under Pressure in Scotland
UKIP MEP debates Scottish Nationalist Protester on Newsnight
http://www.youtube.com/v/Dd2lpJYpx8c?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata Originally posted here: UKIP MEP debates Scottish Nationalist Protester on Newsnight
Nigel Farage blasts ‘fascist’ protesters after Edinburgh confrontation
http://www.youtube.com/v/CuNC8tQZeKg?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata Follow this link: Nigel Farage blasts ‘fascist’ protesters after Edinburgh confrontation
Independent Scotland could lose the pound
Relying on first hand Euro experience, the British Treasury announced on Tuesday they would not enter a formal currency agreement with an independent Scotland, which will hold a referendum in September 2014 to decide whether to split from the UK. Westminster has already made it clear it does not support Scotland breaking away, and now the Treasury has issued a warning that an independent Scotland could endanger their currency. Chancellor George Osborne said it would be a ‘dive into uncharted waters’ speaking in Glasgow, where he was meeting with Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander on Tuesday. If Scotland stays with the pound, it would put the UK finance sector at risk, with little liability, according to Osborne.“Why would 58 million citizens give away some of their sovereignty over monetary and potentially other economic policy to five million people in another state?” said Osborne.”If Scotland wants to keep the pound, the best way they could do that would be to stay in the United Kingdom,” Osborne told BBC radio. The Scottish Greens, a political faction, accused Osborne and Finance Secretary John Swinney of waging a phony war. “Osborne’s economic credibility is in tatters and now he’s attempting to wage a phony war by suggesting we’re doomed unless we stick with the existing arrangements,” Patrick Harvie wrote on the party’s website.“The sharing of the pound between an independent Scotland and the rest of the U.K. is the common-sense position supported by the Fiscal Commission,” Scottish Finance Secretary John Swinney said in the statement. “A sterling zone is also in the overwhelming economic interests of the rest of the U.K. every bit as much as it is in the interests of Scotland.” Most recent opinion polls show around 30% of Scots are in favor of independence, while 50% are opposed.Euro as a case studyThe currency threat from London comes a week after Fitch downgraded the UK economy from AA+ to AAA, which prompted incoming Bank of England Governor Mark Carney to label Britain as a ‘crisis economy’ After the downgrade there is ‘no economic rationale’ for the UK to share their currency, according to the finance report. Ministers are worried Scotland could be the UK’s version of Italy, Spain, Portugal or Greece- an economic burden. Osborne and the finance ministry worry the currency pairing would make the UK susceptible to a euro-style currency crisis. Scotland’s First Minister, Alex Salmond, says his country will be fiscally independent even if they stay with the pound. In recent years the Scottish government has maintained a surplus while the rest of the UK’s debt has doubled, nearing £1.5 trillion, according to the Scotland Times. The Treasury report stated Scotland’s economy would be no larger than New Zealand’s, which has a GDP of about $142 billion. There have been many proposals within the independence movement to establish their own currency and escape the wrath of the euro, and start a sovereign coin, like Iceland and Denmark. Iceland’s GDP ($14 billion) is a fraction of Scotland’s, and it currently runs its own currency, but is considering a move to the euro. Iceland’s currency is regulated, and not free-floating, an alternative Scotland would pursue if it coins its own currency. Denmark has a GDP of about $333 billion, and like Scotland, is abundant in natural and renewable resources. “The recent experience of the euro area has shown that it is extremely challenging to sustain a successful formal currency union without close fiscal integration and common arrangements for the resolution of banking sector difficulties,” the UK finance report said.Scotland independence ‘market neutral’A Scottish state will have a ‘neutral’ effect on markets, according to international ratings agency Fitch. The currency union could, however, pose market dangers to both nations, the report cautions.Both Scotland and Britain could suffer economically if Scotland decides to exit the pound after a few years of independence, or, if the market decides the commitment by each state isn’t strong enough.Another hang up is the governing bank. Presently the Bank of England is the primary lender for Scottish Banks, and therefore, Britain would insist on ‘rigorous oversight’ of fiscal policies.”All of the alternative currency arrangements would be likely to be less economically suitable for both Scotland and the rest of the UK,” the report says.Whose oil is it?Other ‘uncharted waters’ that are at the epicenter of the independence movement is the North Sea, and the oil and natural gas potential it holds.If Scotland were to become a sovereign state, it would, under international continental shelf law, receive rights to the North Sea. The reserves are projected to be between 15 billion and 24 billion barrels of oil: 30-40 years of production, according to the BBC. In its first Oil and Gas Analytical Bulletin, Scotland predicts production in Scottish waters could generate as much as £57 billion in tax revenue by 2018. The North Sea oil shelves, according to the UK, are on the decline, and that Scotland is cooking the books, and real futures only total around £33, according to independent economists at the Office for the Budget Responsibility, the Telegraph reported. Exploration is still ongoing in the North Sea, but output production is heavily dependent on oil prices. If prices remain low, production is less profitable, but if prices spike, so will production, as its more profitable. Dividing North Sea oil geographically would leave the residual UK with only 9% of reserves, but according to an October 2012 note by international credit agency Fitch, this outcome is unlikely. Fitch predicts another compromise would have to be reached, possibly based on a per capita division, which would give the UK 92% of reserves. … Read More
NATO makes no membership guarantees for independent Scotland
Optimistic expectations for Scotland’s NATO membership were initially voiced Tuesday by Alex Salmond, First Minister of Scotland. He said an independent Scotland, which he hopes to see after a referendum next year, would be an active member of the North-Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), but would refuse to host Britain’s nuclear weapons, particularly the submarine-launched Trident missiles.”You have to come to agreement with your colleagues, and in that sense there is a parallel with the European Union – you notify your intent to remain a member,” Salmond told BBC. “We are a member by virtue of our membership of the United Kingdom, and we notify in that period between the referendum, and a successful vote, and the adoption of Scottish independence about 18 months later.”In response to a request for the alliance’s position on the issue, NATO said its ruling council had not discussed Scottish membership, but expressed skepticism over the scenario Salmond outlined: “It appears widely agreed that, as a matter of law, a Scotland which has declared its independence and thereby established its separate statehood would be viewed as a new state,” it said in a written statement.“A new state would not be a party to the North Atlantic treaty, and thus not a member of NATO. If it were to choose to apply for NATO membership, its application would be subject to the normal procedure, as outlined in article 10 of the treaty,” the statement read.Scotland has an advantageous strategic position, and would have considerable hydrocarbon reserves in the North Sea – both factors making it a desirable member for NATO, should it become independent. But Salmond’s pro-independence Scottish National Party (SNP) also seeks to become a nuclear-free country.Critics say the SNP wants to enjoy the protection of NATO’s military might, including its nuclear arsenal, without having to commit fully to the alliance’s shared goals. Some say that this would make Scottish membership in NATO impossible.Labour peer Lord Robertson, the former secretary-general of NATO, said that an independent Scotland would have to sign up to its “strategic concept” before entering, which declares that “as long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance.” The strategic framework also says that “the supreme guarantee of the security of the Allies is provided by the strategic nuclear forces of the Alliance.”“Does the SNP accept this unambiguous acceptance of the nuclear umbrella?” he said. “I supervised the entry of seven new members to NATO in 2002 and every one of them had to accept the strategic concept. If the SNP cannot accept the NATO strategic concept then it will simply not get in.”Proponents of an independent Scotland as a non-nuclear member of NATO expressed hopes that the nation would nonetheless be allowed to join.“Only three of NATO’s 28 members are actually nuclear-weapons states. The majority are fully committed members of the alliance without hosting nuclear weapons, which is exactly what an independent Scotland would be,” a government spokesperson said.The UK government is determined to maintain its nuclear weapons arsenal, including those deployed in Scotland. During a visit to Scotland on April 4, Prime Minister David Cameron reaffirmed his commitment to the Trident missile program. He cited the threat of North Korea as justification for maintaining Britain’s nuclear arsenal.Scotland will hold a referendum on whether it should become independent from Great Britain in September 2014. Proponents of the idea said it would allow Edinburg to issue better policies and boost the economy. Critics say it would hurt Scotland’s businesses, and compromise its security. So far, opinion polls show that the majority of Scots are against complete independence, but would support increased autonomy. … Read More








