Tag Archives: Street

Image gold-300x225.jpg

Why Mainstream Media, Main Street And Institutions Fail To See The Benefits Of Gold

Many of today’s investors have only lived through the long term bull market of financial assets, between 1980 and 2000. Those two decades have been characterized by strong growth in bond and equity markets. At the same time, gold & silver prices experienced a slow and steady decline. Nick Barisheff remembers it was remarkable how the Central Banks, Wall Street and the media were exploiting every opportunity to make negative comments about precious metals.
The cycle before that started in 1968. It included US President Nixon putting an end to the Gold standard in 1971 and peaked with the gold and silver mania in 1980. And here we are again; gold and silver have outperformed every other asset class for 12 years in a row. Still, precious metals are almost off the radar in the mainstream media. There is less than 0.5% of the total portfolio invested in bullion and mining stocks globally in institutions, while less than 1% is invested by the general public.
Here is the key point: if you’ve only lived through one cycle, it’s very difficult to change your mind. Clearly most people today aren’t able to see beyond the financial asset bull market; they still tend to ignore today’s spectacular gold bull market. Essentially it requires a major paradigm shift in your way of thinking. It’s at this point where the psychological factors come into play. In his book, Nick Barisheff mentions 3 psychological factors that are preventing people from looking at this with an open mind:

Complacency, which is the “routine” behavior that prevents us being open-minded to new evolutions or trends (in this context: willing to admit that the new economic cycle)
Cognitive dissonance indicates the difficulty of making a choice between conflicting options
Normalcy bias is our natural tendency to downplay the probability of a non-regular event (in this context: a currency collapse, a long period of economic stagflation, a hyperinflation)

If you take a closer look, you will recognize these patterns constantly around you. Unless you are able to move past these mental issues, you will stay blindfolded. It doesn’t matter which evidence is presented, like for example a ten-year gold price chart or the decline in value of currencies.
Main street public ignores gold’s real benefits
We have strong evidence of gold’s upward move, with a gold price that has gone from $ 275 in 2001 to a new 11 month high at $1,796.50 on October 10th. The economy continues to look worse with the day, as the Eurozone keeps on struggling with debts and the IMF just issued a grim warning of a weaker global economy. And yet, people keep on talking about gold being overpriced. The most common arguments you hear are that a further price increase is irrational and that it’s too late to invest. Apart from the earlier discussed mental factors that are into play, here is a more fundamental reason barrier: the lack of understanding of the monetary system. It’s mandatory to have a basic understanding of what money and currencies are.
Nick Barisheff often uses the following example. A lot of people still think that gold’s only purpose is for jewelry. With a price of nearly $1,8000, gold is probably overpriced as far as jewelry is concerned. This point becomes perfectly clear on a day like September 13th, when Bernanke announced QE3. The price of gold went up by more than $ 25 in less than an hour. So does that mean that everyone stood up to buy jewelry right after Bernanke’s speech? The central point here is that an announcement was made to debase the US dollar, without any limit, without any timeframe. Anybody with a basic understanding of how money and currencies work, could connect the dots. It’s almost a sure thing that the gold price will continue to rise.
This is so important to understand: it’s the currency that is being debased. The announcement of Ben Bernanke on September 13th stated that the currency was debased to infinity. The rise of the gold price is simply a natural result of that event.
Again, main street public can’t connect the dots as they don’t understand the dynamics of money and currency. They are not to blame in fact, as it wasn’t taught in school or in economic classes. There is even no economic course or university that goes in to the fundamentals of money, how it’s created, the dynamics in that market and so on. The only exception is the Austrian School of Economics.
When you start looking at the history of currencies, there isn’t one example in human history where fiat currency didn’t go through a hyperinflation or complete collapse. Not one! Now for the first time ever we have a reserve currency and a global fiat currency system that is one way or another tied to the US dollar. History is about to repeat once again as we are moving to the same kind of end game.
You really need to get acquainted with topics like money, how the Federal Reserve and the fractional reserve system work, how currencies are being debased and the roles of interest rates and inflation. That’s quite an effort in terms of education for most people.
The primary condition for a better understanding: education
Nick Barisheff is not saying it’s easy to get up to speed with monetary topics. The day-to-day pressure in our society makes it very hard to step back and educate oneself. Today in a typical family, both partners are working. They need to manage their financial and retirement issues, their daily household issues, etc. Our world is subject to a greater level of change than ever before (business, legislation, technological advances, etc). So it’s a big challenge to take the education that is required.
Unfortunately that’s exactly the kind of thing that will cause many people to be blindsided. Educational sites, interviews or books are going to help some people but not the entirety. Most people will jump on board when it becomes totally obvious; that’s probably when hyperinflation hits. For sure it will be too late. That will be the time when gold will be a discussion topic on all cocktail parties and when you will see taxi drivers convincingly explain to people why they should own gold. However, most of them won’t understand why they are investing in it even when the price of gold will probably be rising $100 a day.
We see today already a loss in confidence in traditional institutions like for example the government, banks and (traditional) media. In fact, that trend has been going on for quite some years but it has been accelerating in the past decade. It could bring us faster to the tipping point, as an increasing number of people could turn to alternative media (freely available on the internet) in order to educate themselves.
We saw it all before
You can compare today’s situation with the bull market of the 80’s and 90’s in the high tech stocks on NASDAQ. Although the bull started its run in 1982, it was only in 1998 that 90% of investors started investing. Obviously that was just in time to totally get crushed. A similar evolution took place in the gold bull market of the 70′s.
As from 1974, the US government allowed their citizens to own gold again. If you look at the newspapers back in the 70′s, the main message that was given to the people was how the US dollar was declining x percent against gold. They didn’t say that gold went up with x percent. That’s exactly how the right perception was created. Today’s focus of most media is “how the gold price is going up … for no apparent reason”. All Western economies are accelerating the printing of money, that’s enough reason on itself for gold’s appreciation.
All economic forces are stronger right now compared to the previous gold bull market. Excessive money printing is taking place on a global scale. Also, the 70’s bull market wasn’t global in nature. It was a US phenomenon primarily because the US dollar was declining after it was removed from the gold standard. Gold went up to a lesser extent in Canada and the UK. However, it did not appreciate in German Marks or Swiss Francs.
Why mainstream media avoids talking about the real benefits of gold
There are still big entrenchments from the financial community. The wealth managers, money managers, private banks, pension funds … they are still against the rise of precious metals, perpetuating the idea that gold is a risky asset and that it’s useless as it doesn’t pay any interest or dividend. Those arguments are all easily refuted. But still these negative articles keep on appearing, even now after a fantastic 12 year bull ride. You don’t see something similar in other asset classes. There are considerably less negative articles about oil, potash or natural gas to name some examples. Nick Barisheff admits that he doesn’t know if it’s on purpose, if it’s going to change or when it could change.
Coincidence or not, Forbes announced an article devoted to gold almost exactly the same time of this Q&A with Nick Barisheff: Gold can save us from disaster. The article is written by Steve Forbes himself and will appear in their magazine as well. Could this be a sign that the tide is turning? Are we right now close to the tipping point? Only time will tell, but things are worsening every day in our economy and the least we can say is that the situation is alarming. Do you own physical gold and silver?
Note that BMG offers a lot of valuable insights and resources with an educational character on their website. The information is freely available. Much more insights are published in Nick’s book “$10,000 Gold: Why Gold’s Inevitable Rise is the Investor’s Safe Haven” which will be released later this year and is available for pre-order on Amazon.com.
Read the previous article with Nick Barisheff  The Destruction Of Currency And Rise Of Gold
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

Contributed by Contributing Author of Gold Silver Worlds. Read More

Image wereevil-300x200.jpg

America’s Moral Degeneracy

On May 31, 2010, the Israeli right-wing government sent armed military troops to illegally board in international waters Gaza aid ships of the Gaza Freedom Flotilla organized by the Free Gaza Movement and the Turkish Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief. The Israelis murdered 8 Turkish citizens and one US citizen in cold blood. Many others were wounded by the forces of “the only democracy in the Middle East.”
Despite the murder of its citizen, Washington immediately took the side of the crazed Israeli government. The Turks had a different response. The prime minister of Turkey, Erdogan, said that the next aid ships would be protected by the Turkish navy. But Washington got hold of its puppet and paid him to shut up. Once upon a time, the Turks were a fierce people. Today they are Washington’s puppets.
We have witnessed this during the past week. The Turkish government is permitting the Islamists from outside Syria, organized by the CIA and Israel, to attack Syria from Turkish territory. On several occasions a mortar shell has, according to news reports if you believe them, fallen just inside the Turkey border. The Turkish military has used the excuse to launch artillery barrages into Syria.
People who with good cause no longer believe the US and western media or the US and western governments think that the mortar shells were fired by US or Israeli operatives, or by the “rebels” they support, in order to give Turkey the excuse to start a NATO war with Syria. A UN sanctioned NATO invasion or air strikes, as in Libya, has been blocked by the Russians and Chinese. But if Syria and Turkey get into a war, NATO must come to the aid of its NATO member, Turkey.
Once again we see that Muslims are easily dominated and slaughtered by Western countries, because Muslim countries are incapable of supporting one another. Instead of supporting one another, Muslim governments accept payoffs to support instead the Christian/Zionist forces of the Western bloc.
Washington knows this, which is one reason why Washington began its assertion of world hegemony in the Muslim Middle East.
In the West, the Ministry of Propaganda continues to talk about the “Syrian revolt.” There is no revolt. What has happened is that the US and Israel have equipped with weapons and sent into Syria Islamists who wish to overthrow the secular Syrian government. Washington knows that if the Syrian government can be destroyed, the country will dissolve into warring factions like Iraq and Libya.
America’s European and Japanese puppet states are, of course, part of Washington’s operation. There will be no complaints from them. But why is the rest of the world content for Washington to interfere in the sovereign affairs of nations to the point of invading, sending in drones and assassination teams, and murdering vast numbers of citizens in seven countries?
Does this acquiescence mean that the world has accepted Washington’s claim that it is the indispensable country with the right to rule the world?
Why, for example, do Russia and Venezuela permit the US government to fund their political opposition?
The one party American state has no political opposition. But imagine if it did. Would Washington tolerate the funding of its opposition by Russia or Venezuela? Obviously not. Those running against America with foreign money would be arrested and imprisoned, but not in Venezuela or Russia, countries where, apparently, treason is legal.
On October 8, Hugo Chavez defeated his American-financed opponent, Henrique Capriles, 54% to 44%.
This would be an amazing margin of victory in a US presidential election. However, in his previous reelection Chavez won by 27%. Obviously, Washington’s money and the propaganda activities of the US-financed Non-Governmental Organizations succeeded in swaying Venezuelans and reducing Chavez’s margin of victory to 10%. Washington’s interference is a massive barrier to leadership in other countries. Fully 44% of the Venezuelan people were too brainwashed or too stupid to vote for their own country’s candidate and voted instead for Washington’s candidate.
It is extraordinary that 44% of the Venezuelan voters voted to become an American puppet state, like Turkey, England, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Portugal, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Poland, the Baltics, Scandinavia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Mexico, Belgium, Taiwan, Colombia, Pakistan, Yemen. Probably, I have left out a few.
As a high government official once told me, “Empire costs us a great deal of money.”
Washington has to pay its puppets to represent Washington instead of their own peoples.
Washington in its hubris forgets that its rule is purchased and not loved. Washington’s puppets have sold their integrity and that of their countries for filthy lucre. When the money runs out, so does the empire.
By then the American people will be as corrupted as the foreign “leaders.” In his review of The United States And Torture, edited by Marjorie Cohn (New York University Press, 2011) in the Fall 2012 Independent Review, Anthony Gregory writes:
“In Reagan’s America, a common theme in Cold War rhetoric was that the Soviets tortured people and detained them without cause, extracted phony confessions through cruel violence, and did the unspeakable to detainees who were helpless against the full, heartless weight of the Communist state. As much as any other evil, torture differentiated the bad guys, the Commies, from the good guys, the American people and their government. However imperfect the U.S. system might be, it had civilized standards that the enemy rejected.”
By 2005, a year after torture photos from Abu Ghraib were leaked, polls of Americans showed that 38% had succumbed to the propaganda that torture was justified in some circumstances. After four more years of neoconservative advocacy of torture, an Associated Press poll reported in 2009 that 52% of Americans approved of torture.
Torture apparently was an instrument of US cold war policy. Torture was taught to Latin American militaries by the US School of the Americas, which operated in Panama and subsequently at Fort Benning, Georgia. However, this was a clandestine operation. It awaited the neoconservative Bush regime for US Department of Justice (sic) attorneys, graduates of the best law schools, to write legal memos justifying torture despite US statutory and international laws prohibiting torture, and for both the president and vice president of the United States to openly acknowledge and justify torture. Some of the criminals who wrote these memos are now teaching in prestigious law schools. One was appointed to the federal judiciary and sits as a judge sentencing others for their offenses.
We can conclude with Anthony Gregory that it is not only foreign political regimes that are corrupted by Washington’s evil, but also Americans themselves. “Nothing better demonstrates the moral degeneracy of American political culture than the U.S. torture state.”
Washington still masquerades wearing the white hat, and most of the rest of the world is paid to go along with the masquerade.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

Contributed by Paul Craig Roberts of Institute for Political Economy.
About Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Visit his web site at the Institute for Political Economy.
This article has been posted with permission from Dr. Paul Craig Roberts.
Copyright Paul Craig Roberts 2012. Read More

Now Ireland is Nationalizing the Banks

http://www.youtube.com/v/lEHmdBPsN48?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata Read article here -  Now Ireland is Nationalizing the Banks

The Good, The Bad and the Very Very Incruentalously Ugly!

http://www.youtube.com/v/pinJp9i-qN4?version=3&f=videos&app=youtube_gdata This article:  The Good, The Bad and the Very Very Incruentalously Ugly!

Two Americans share 2012 Nobel for chemistry

The 2012 Nobel Prize in Chemistry has been awarded to Robert J. Lefkowitz and Brian K. Kobilka for studies of G-proteincoupled receptors which helps explain how cells in the human body “sense” their environment.Physics Nobel shared for quantum optics research (9 Oct 12)
Nobel in medicine goes to stem cell researchers (8 Oct 12)
Nobel’s last will and testament: a background (8 Oct 12)

The studies of the two winners, Robert J. Lefkowitz, of Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Duke University Medical Center and Brian K. Kobilka of the Stanford University School of Medicine, revolved around the mystery of how cells could sense their environment.Your body is a fine-tuned system of interactions between billions of cells. Each cell has tiny receptors that enable it to sense its environment, so it can adapt to new situations, wrote the Nobel Committee in a statement. The prize was awarded for the winners’ discoveries which revealed the inner workings of one family of such receptors, the G-proteincoupled receptors.Speaking from his home in the US during the press conference, Lefkowitz was ecstatic about the victory.”I’m feeling very, very excited. I was fast asleep when the phone rang but I did not hear it. I must share with you that I wear ear plugs, he told the gathered press.”My wife gave me an elbow and said ‘phone for you’. And there it was. A total shock and surprise.The shock of the win has also thrown a spanner in the works for the researcher, who had planned other activities for his Wednesday.”I’m thinking it’s going to be a very, very hectic day. I was going to get a haircut… but I’m afraid that will probably have to be postponed,” he said.But the scientist’s discoveries were a long time coming, and the result of decades of work.Researches had long suspecting that cell surfaces contained some kind of recipient for hormones.In 1968, Lefkowitz began experimenting with radioactivity as a means of tracing cells receptors, in an effort to solve the puzzle of how the cells could sense their environment. Through the addition of an iodine isotope to various hormones, Lefkowitz and a team of researchers managed to extract a receptor from its hiding place and began to understand how they functioned.In the 1980s, the team recruited Kobilka whose creative approach to isolating the one specific gene from the gigantic human genome allowed further breakthroughs, including the discovery that this particular receptor was similar to those in the eye which capture light.This family is now referred to as G-proteincoupled receptors, of which roughly one thousand genes code for receptors including light, flavour, odour, adrenalin, histamine, dopamine and serotonin.The studies by Lefkowitz and Kobilka are crucial for understanding how G-proteincoupled receptors function, said the Nobel committee. Be sure to follow The Local’s Nobel Prize live blog here for more information and background on the prizes.Oliver GeeFollow Oliver on Twitter here Read More

Live Blog: 2012 Nobel Prize announcements

The winners of the 2012 Nobel Prizes are being announced this week in Stockholm. The Local brings you all the latest news, reactions, and details surrounding the winners and why they won.Nobel’s last will and testament: a background (8 Oct 12)
Nobel in medicine goes to stem cell researchers (8 Oct 12)
Wednesday, October 10th: Chemistry PrizeDavid Landes, 12.15.pm
Just had a look at the website of the Lefkowitz lab and was surprised to find sections for “Lab Halloween Party 2010″ as well as a funny video titled “Why we are pursuing careers in science and not performing arts….”. Who says scientists don’t know how to have fun?David Landes, 12.15.pm
So, three down, three to go for this year’s Nobel Prize announcements. I wasn’t able to follow the whole explanation, but I couldn’t help laugh when the Academy member giving the talk paused, grabbed a cup of coffee, took a sip, and sighed.”Ahh, Thanks to these G-proteincoupled receptors I can really enjoy this cup of coffee,” she remarked.I know that’s what I think every time I down a cup o’ java.Rebecca Martin, 12.09pm via TwitterRebecca Martin, 12.07pm via Twitter
“I didn’t go to sleep last night expecting this call.” Lefkowitz live on the phone from the US. #NobelRebecca Martin, 12.05pm via Twitter
Finally a question on the research… and half of the gathered press, including myself, look a bit lost again. #nobelDavid Landes, 11.58am
They now have Lefkowitz on the phone at the press conference. It’s 6am where he is in the US and this is what he said.”I’m feeling very, very excited.”I was fast asleep and the phone rang but I did not hear it. I must share with you that I wear ear plugs.”My wife gave me an elbow and said ‘phone for you’. And there it was. A total shock and surprise.”I’m thinking it’s going to be a very, very hectic day. I was going to get a haircut…but I’m afraid that will probably have to be postponed.”David Landes, 11.46am
The woman explaining the science involved with G-proteincoupled receptors compared them to a telephone operator switchboard.David Landes, 11.46amWINNERS ANNOUNCED: And the prize goes to:
Robert J. Lefkowitz, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA, and Brian K. Kobilka, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA for studies of G-proteincoupled receptors. Congratulations!Oliver Gee, 11.42am
Speaking of chemistry humour…should I tell you a joke about sodium? Na…………………………………David Landes, 11.40am
Hah! Rebecca, you’ve got my sides splitting…just like an atom! Oh wait…I think that might be a physics joke. Darn. Best to leave the humour to the experts.Rebecca Martin, 11.39am via Twitter
I want to apologize about the rubbish chemistry jokes I have been telling…but all the good ones Argon. :) #nobelDavid Landes, 11.38am
Yikes! Only minutes away…I can feel the anticipation from here at TL HQ. According to the folks at Thomson Reuters Science Watch, quantum dots may take home the prize.Rebecca Martin, 11.35am via Twitter
Again, just like yesterday, the announcement will be read by Prof Staffan Normark, permanent secretary of the RSAS. Oliver Gee, 11.30am
15 minutes until the announcement… time for a fun fact:2011′s winner, Dan Shechtman, is the fourth Israeli to win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry Prize in under a decade. He discovered the iconsahedral phase, which opened the new field of quasiperiodic crystals.Oliver Gee, 11.00am
Two of our interns just took to the streets of Stockholm to ask people which of the Nobel prizes was their favourite… and why. Chemistry did not get a mention:Click here to read Stockholmers’ favourite Nobel prizesRebecca Martin, 10.50am via Twitter
On my way to see who gets this year’s Nobel prize for chemistry. Any last minute bets or guesses? Is it difficult or…elementary? #NobelDavid Landes, 10.40am
With an hour or so to go before we know this year’s Nobel Laureate in chemistry, a quick look at what the experts at the ChemBark chemistry blog have to say reveals that research in “Nuclear Hormone Signaling” has the best chance of winning, at 6-1 odds.The question is…what exactly is nuclear hormone signaling?Oliver Gee, 10.20am
While you’re no doubt sitting with bated breath, waiting for the announcement, here is some trivia for you:Frederick Sanger, a British biochemist, is the only one out of the 160 Nobel Laureates between 1901 and 2011 who has been awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry twice.Oliver Gee, 10.01am
Wednesday marks the third Nobel Prize announcement for 2012 with the winners for Chemistry being announced later in the morning. Be sure to check in on Twitter with Rebecca Martin who will be at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and giving us the low down as it happens.Tuesday, October 9th: Physics PrizeDavid Landes, 2.40pm
I realize the excitement of today’s announcement may be starting to wear off, but for those of you out there who just can’t get enough (and fancy yourselves scientifically oriented), check out this thrilling read provided by the Royal Academy as “scientific background” on this year’s Nobel in physics:MEASURING AND MANIPULATING INDIVIDUAL QUANTUM SYSTEMSDoesn’t get much more exciting than that, eh?Oliver Gee, 1.10pm
I am back in the office again and catching my breath after a whirlwind morning at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. That’s enough tweeting from me, but we’ll be updating this blog with a few more nuggets this afternoon, and then back in force again tomorrow for the Nobel Chemistry Prize.David Landes, 1.03pm
Have updated our main article about the physics prize with a few additional nuggets from L’Huillier. Check it out here.Rebecca Martin, 12.51pm
Maybe it will soon be clearer – just received word that The Local’s Oliver Gee snagged a chat with Anne L’Huillier from the Nobel panel. Her answers on The Local soon! David Landes, 12.31pm
I don’t know about you, but I’m having a hard time getting my head around the research recognized with this year’s Nobel in physics.Of course, we’re journalists, not scientists. At least we managed to spell the winners’ names correctly. As Rebecca pointed out below, David Wineland’s name gave some journalists a headache or two.Indeed, his co-winner Serge Haroche also had his name misspelled a few times…as Harrosche.Oliver Gee, 12.25pm via TwitterRebecca Martin, 12.22pm
There seems to have been some confusion in the Swedish media as to how to spell Wineland’s family name. Both Vineland and Weinland were spotted before everyone finally got it right. Rebecca Martin, 12.21pm
Did you know that both Wineland and Haroche were born in 1944, although in different parts of the world?Oliver Gee, 12.11am via Twitter
“Tried not to expect too much, and it was a wonderful surprise. There are many people who deserve this award.” Haroche live from Paris.Rebecca Martin, 12.10pm
When Swedish national broadcaster SVT managed to get French winner Haroche on the phone – unfortunately on a rather bad line – he said that he would phone his kids to tell them at once. And then he was going to celebrate with a glass of Champagne. Oliver Gee, 11.54am via Twitter
Now we get the details about the two winners and their research. Deep insights into quantum physics. A lot of confused faces here right now.Oliver Gee, 11.51am via Twitter
… For ground-breaking experimental methods that enable measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems.Oliver Gee, 11.48am via TwitterWINNERS ANNOUNCED:This year’s prize goes to Serge Haroche and Prof David J WinelandOliver Gee, 11.41am via Twitter
Official announcement to say that the official announcement will occur on time.David Landes, 11.38am
The 2012 Nobel prize winner in Physics will be announced by Professor Staffan Normark, Permanent Secretary at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (RSAS) and 7 minutes have been allotted for questions from the gathered press. Rebecca Martin, 11.29am
Did you know that of the 191 individuals awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics since the start, only two are women; Marie Curie in 1903 and Maria Goeppert-Mayer 1963. Curie was awarded the Nobel Prize twice, once in Physics and once in Chemistry 1911.Oliver Gee, 11.20am via TwitterRebecca Martin, 11.17am
Also, John Bardeen is the only person who has received the Nobel Prize in Physics twice; once in 1956 and then again in 1972. Rebecca Martin, 11.10am
Did you know the very first Nobel Prize in Physics, awarded in 1901, was awarded to Wilhelm Conrad Rntgen? On November 8th, 1895, he produced and detected electromagnetic radiation in a wavelength range today known as X-rays.Oliver Gee, 11.06am via TwitterOliver Gee, 10.50am via Twitter
The average age of a #Nobel Physics prize winner is 54. That is, incidentally, the number of minutes until this years winner is announced.Oliver Gee, 10.44am via Twitter
On my train to the the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for the #Nobel physics announcement. Any guesses for the winner?Oliver Gee, 10.05pm
In the lead up to the Nobel Prizes, the list of winners is a closely guarded secret (even the winners dont know in advance) – but that doesnt mean you cant speculate. Many have pointed to the Higgs boson discovery as the surefire favourite to win the physics prize today but with so many people involved in the discovery, and only a maximum of three winners allowed, which name(s) will be announced if this is the case?Ill be there at the announcement, be sure to follow me on Twitter for live tweets, pictures, and maybe an interview or two.Rebecca Martin, 9.44am
Did you know that the average age for all the Physics Laureates between 1901 and 2011 – when awarded the prize – is 54?In fact, the most frequent age bracket for Physics Laureates is 45-49 and only one has been under 30 years when getting the award. Lawrence Bragg, who was awarded the Nobel Prize with his father in 1915, was only 25 years old at the time.David Landes, 9.07am
Good morning again and welcome to day 2 of The Local’s Nobel Prize announcement week.Today we’re getting ready to learn who will receive the prize in physics. The announcement is set to be announced at 11.45am local times at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in Stockholm.Interesting fact (courtesy of www.nobelprize.org), the physics prize was the first one mentioned in Alfred Nobel’s will.Also, so far only two of the 191 Nobel Laureates in physics have been women. Monday, October 8th: Medicine PrizeDavid Landes, 5.47pm
Well, that’s a wrap for today. Feel free to scroll through the blog postings below to get a taste of what went down during day one of Nobel Prize announcement week.And tune back in tomorrow (Tuesday) for more Nobel excitement with the announcement of the 2012 Nobel Prize for Physics, scheduled to take place around midday.Rebecca Martin, 5.41pm
The choice of winners this year is certainly going to ruffle some feathers. The choice has already been called “controversial” due to the research still being in its early stages. However, according to the Karolinska Institute, there was a “lack of candidates” for the 2012 year’s prize. David Landes, 5.19pm
In Japan, Shinya Yamanaka, co-winner of the 2012 Nobel in medicine, held a press conference at his university in Kyoto, telling reporters he’d received a congratulatory call from Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda which made him a little nervous.He also stressed that it would be some time before his discoveries would result in practical treatments for patients.”For many illnesses, another five to ten years worth of research is needed,” he said, according to Japanese TV channel NHK.David Landes, 4.53pm
Newly named Nobel Laureate John Gurdon managed came late to the morning meeting at his lab on Monday…apparently a very unusual occurrence. Even though he’d just been told he won the 2012 Nobel Prize, he managed to keep the news a secret from his colleagues until the announcement was made official in Stockholm.”They couldn’t believe their ears,” Tony Kouzarides of the Gurdon Institute told reporters of his colleauges’ reaction, according to Sweden’s TT news agency.Oliver Gee, 2.53pm
Check out this quick video of The Local’s David Landes interviewing Gran Hansson, Secretary General of the Nobel Committee at Karolinska Institutet, following Monday’s announcement:David Landes, 12.23pm via Twitter
#Nobel committee member Jonas Frisen told me 2012 medicine prize discovery is like finding the ‘master keys’ for cell biology. David Landes, 12.20pm via Twitter
Just spoke to Nobel committee head Gran Hansson about 2012 medicine winners’ reactions when he called to tell them the news. Rebecca Martin, 12.05pm
Last year’s Nobel laureates were awarded 10 million kronor ($1.5 million). This year’s winners will get 8 million. In the summer, the Nobel Foundation announced that it would lower the prize money for the first time in over 60 years. The decrease was motivated by the financial crisis and the European recession. Rebecca Martin, 11.58am
That may have been all from Karolinska but we’ll continue to report on the background and the reactions to the award announcement here.David Landes, 11.53am via Twitter
Well, that’s a wrap from the first Nobel Prize announcement of 2012. Stay tuned to @TheLocalSweden for more #Nobel news this weekRebecca Martin, 11.53am
More information on the winnersOliver Gee, 11:45am
Gran K. Hansson, Secretary of the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine, who announced the winner and is taking questions, explained that he has spoken to the two winners and said they are equally happy and excited about coming to Stockholm.Oliver Gee, 11:32amWINNERS ANNOUNCED The 2012 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine has been awarded to John B. Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka for research into stem cells for the discovery that mature cells can be reprogrammed to become pluripoint.David Landes, 11.23am via Twitter
Journalists have been kicked out of auditorium for a sound check…or maybe they’ve lost the paper with the winner(s) Rebecca Martin, 11.20am
So far – only 10 women have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine, last time was in 2009 when Elizabeth H. Blackburn was given the prize for her discovery of how chromosomes are protected by telomeres and the enzyme telomerase. Find the full list of women laureates here.David Landes, 11.14am via Twitter
Auditorium is filling up, but far from overflowing yet…you can feel the anticipation in the room…Rebecca Martin, 11.10am
For a background on the last will and testament of Nobel, make sure to check out this.Oliver Gee, 11:07am
Students take the opportunity to use the Nobel Prize as a platform to protest, holding up banners stating: Research suffers when students are homeless and Student housing a national interest.Rebecca Martin, 11.04am
Did you know that the Nobel Foundation has decreed that a maximum of three people can share most prizes (although the Peace Prize can go to groups)? So, the question is will today’s prize got to one scientist, to two, or to three?David Landes, 10.55am via Twitter
Dagens Nyheter science writer ‏Karin Bojs predicts the Nobel Prize in medicine will be awarded for stem cell research.David Landes, 10.21am
OK…leaving The Local headquarters and heading off to Karolinska. Be sure to keep checking back for updates and live tweets from today’s upcoming announcement.David Landes, 10.01am
In less than two hours, the first 2012 Nobel Prize winner (winners?) will be announced. First up in what will be a week filled with Nobel news will be the prize for Physiology or Medicine, awarded by the Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet.Last year, three researchers were awarded the prize for discoveries related to the immune system.This year, some experts are speculating that the prize will go to researchers in Japan for 2007 discoveries related to stem cells.Interested in more background on the Nobel Prizes? Check out this past feature from The Local archives about how the man who invented dynamite became a champion for peace. Read More

‘I have been here for 27 hours’: anti-nuke activist

Several Greenpeace activists claim they are still inside nuclear plant Ringhals, in the south of Sweden, after breaking into restricted areas on Tuesday. Activists break into Swedish nuclear plants (9 Oct 12)
Greenpeace report slams Swedish nuclear plants (2 Oct 12)
Threat levels raised after power plant ‘bomb’ find (21 Jun 12)

I have been here for almost 27 hours, said activist Isadora Wronski to newspaper Aftonbladet.The Local reported on Tuesday how some 20 activists had managed to breach the restricted areas of Ringhals on bicycles. At the same time several activists broke into Forsmark plant, on the east coast. According to Aftonbladet, the activists climbed a roof within the restricted area with the help of a ladder and subsequently hid under a tarpaulin. Apart from a helicopter hovering over them for a while on Tuesday, they say they have managed to move around unimpeded.We havent seen any guards or police today. We think that the workers have gone back to work. When we look down towards the reactors we see no security at all, said Wronski to the paper, adding that there is Swedish nuclear plant security is in a state of crisis. According to Wronski there is nothing to indicate that security personnel at the plant have detected the activists or are even looking for them. We have food enough to manage and we can stay here until (minister for the environment) Lena Ek decides to shut down the Swedish reactors, said Wronski.The police were surprised when Aftonbladet called them up, telling them that there are still activists inside the restricted areas of Ringhals:Well have to look into it. Do they want us to find them? I dont suppose they will come out, in that case?, said local police officer Stefan Dahlhielm to the paper.Ringhals spokesperson Gsta Larsen is not convinced that the activists are really on the premises: I have been told that there are people who claim to still be here at Ringhals. Thats a hypothetical question. Anyone could call and say that they are without actually being here. We dont think they are. Police have searched the area with dogs and equipment, said Larsen to the paper. But of course it is possible, Ringhals is not a small factory. It has a lot of buildings, dumpsters and other things, so they could be hiding somewhere. I guess well have to keep looking.According to daily Expressen, four activists were arrested at Ringhals by 9.30am on Wednesday morning. Police will now carry out a more extensive search of the area. Environment minister Lena Ek has also called a crisis meeting for later on Wednesday afternoon.The Local/rmtwitter.com/thelocalsweden Read More